Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 27;8:282. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00282

Table 3.

Results of univariate and multivariate cox regression models for OS.

Factor Hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) p-value
Univariate
Age 1.04 (1.01, 1.07) 0.008
CA19-9 at diagnosis 1.00003 (0.99999, 1.00006) 0.145
Pre-SBRT CA19-9 1.00022 (1.00007, 1.00036) 0.004
Post-SBRT CA19-9 1.0004 (1.0002, 1.0006) <0.001
Change in CA19-9 1.00007 (0.99972, 1.00043) 0.687
CA19-9 normalization 0.35 (0.12, 0.98) 0.045
Previous EBRT Dose 0.03 (0.00, infinity) 0.998
Recurrent lesion vs. non-recurrent 0.51 (0.30, 0.89) 0.017
GTV volume (cm3) 1.004 (0.995, 1.013) 0.390
PTV volume (cm3) 1.01 (1.00, 1.03) 0.044
BED ≥ 60 0.77 (0.45, 1.30) 0.3268
Multiple fractions vs. single fraction 0.72 (0.51, 1.02) 0.068
Chemo: Gemcitibine + Capcitabine vs. Gemcitibine 0.92 (0.54, 1.55) 0.746
Chemo: FU based vs. Gemcitibine 0.51 (0.18, 1.44) 0.203
Stage 1.90 (1.52–2.37) <0.001
Surgery vs. no surgery 0.30 (0.20, 0.45) <0.001
Dose 0.97 (0.94, 1.00) 0.040
Multivariate analysis
Surgery 0.36 (0.19, 0.70) 0.002
CA19-9 Normalization 0.32 (0.1, 0.94) 0.037
Post-SBRT CA19-9 1.0004 (1.0001, 1.0005) 0.003