Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 26;10(7):828. doi: 10.3390/nu10070828

Table A1.

Quality assessment of studies.

Study SD RSG AC Blinding of Research Blinding of PP Blinding of OA LE Do They Describe Confounders in an Adjusted Analysis? Do You Assess the Balance between the Groups at the Start of the Study?
Rifai et al. [25] RCT Low risk Unclear risk High risk High risk High risk Unclear risk NA NA
Silver * [17] RCT Unclear risk Unclear risk Unclear risk Unclear risk Unclear risk Unclear risk NA NA
Vittos et al. * [21] Cohort NA NA NA NA NA NA Unclear risk Low risk
Hummel et al., (2012) [23] Cohort NA NA NA NA NA NA Unclear risk Low risk
Hummel et al., (2013) [24] Cohort NA NA NA NA NA NA Unclear risk Low risk
Hummel et al., (2014) * [20] Cohort NA NA NA NA NA NA Low risk Unclear risk
Chrysohoou et al., (2009a) * [18] Cross-sectional study NA NA NA NA NA NA Low risk Unclear risk
Chrysohoou et al. (2009b) * [19] Cross-sectional study NA NA NA NA NA NA Low risk Unclear risk
Chrysohoou et al., (2012) [26] Cross-sectional study NA NA NA NA NA NA Low risk Low risk
Levitan et al. [22] Cohort NA NA NA NA NA NA Low risk Low risk
Gonzales et al. * [16] RCT Unclear risk Unclear risk Unclear risk Unclear risk Unclear risk Unclear risk NA NA
Evangelista et al. [27] RCT Unclear risk Unclear risk Unclear risk Unclear risk Unclear risk Unclear risk NA NA

* Abstract; NA: not applicable; SD: study design; RSG: random sequence generation; AC: allocation concealment; PP: participants and personnel; OA: outcome assessment; LE: losses and exclusions.