Table 2.
Growth curve and dietary profiles during experiments.
| Time Point | Vehicle | TTFD-1X | TTFD-2X | TTFD-5X |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial BW (g) | 31.8 ± 0.2 | 32.2 ± 0.3 | 31.7 ± 0.3 | 32.0 ± 0.3 |
| 1st wk BW (g) | 32.3 ± 0.3 | 32.4 ± 0.3 | 32.2 ± 0.2 | 32.1 ± 0.2 |
| 2nd wk BW (g) | 34.5 ± 0.3 | 34.5 ± 0.5 | 34.0 ± 0.3 | 34.0 ± 0.4 |
| 3rd wk BW (g) | 36.5 ± 0.4 | 36.2 ± 0.7 | 36.2 ± 0.5 | 36.0 ± 0.5 |
| 4th wk BW (g) | 37.7 ± 0.4 | 37.0 ± 0.8 | 37.4 ± 0.6 | 36.8 ± 0.6 |
| 5th wk BW (g) | 38.1 ± 0.7 | 37.5 ± 0.7 | 37.1 ± 0.5 | 37.1 ± 0.6 |
| 6th wk BW (g) | 38.5 ± 0.7 | 37.5 ± 0.7 | 38.2 ± 0.5 | 37.5 ± 0.6 |
| Final BW (g) | 38.4 ± 0.8 | 37.4 ± 0.8 | 38.1 ± 0.5 | 37.6 ± 0.5 |
| Water intake (mL/mouse/day) | 9.1 ± 0.2 | 9.1 ± 0.2 | 9.0 ± 0.2 | 8.9 ± 0.2 |
| Chow 5001 (g/mouse/day) | 7.0 ± 0.1 | 6.9 ± 0.1 | 6.9 ± 0.1 | 6.9 ± 0.1 |
Weight and diet were measured regularly for the four groups allocated as vehicle, TTF D-1X, TTFD-2X, and TTFD-5X. All the data are represented as mean ± SEM and analyzed by one-way ANOVA.