Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 13;10(7):897. doi: 10.3390/nu10070897

Table 2.

Vegetable intake (g/day) for girls in Food Neophobia Scale categories—mean ± SD, as well as median, minimum, and maximum values are presented for food neophobia categories and compared between subgroups characterized by an active lifestyle (n = 297) and by sedentary behavior (n = 297), as well as from urban area (n = 292) and suburban area (n = 302).

Food Neophobia Category Neophilic Neophilic Tendency Neutral Neophobic Tendency Neophobic p-Value
Total (n = 594) 242.2 ± 151.9
200 * (50–700)
213.4 ± 149.8
200 * (0–800)
179.8 ± 123.8
150 * (0–700)
112.8 ± 90.0
100 * (0–400)
94.5 ± 90.5
75 * (0–300)
0.0000
Physical activity
Girls characterized by an active lifestyle (n = 297) 263.9 ± 152.2
275 * (100–700)
222.5 ± 163.1
200 * (0–800)
185.4 ± 125.7
200 * (0–700)
111.5 ± 96.9
100 * (0–400)
108.2 ± 92.4
100 (0–300)
0.0000
Girls characterized by sedentary behavior (n = 297) 214.3 ± 152.5
125 * (50–500)
204.3 ± 136.1
200 * (0–600)
174.5 ± 122.1
100 * (0–700)
114.4 ± 85.2
100 * (0–300)
77.8 ± 90.5
50 * (0–300)
0.0007
p-Value 0.3141 0.7540 0.3693 0.7915 0.4250
Place of residence
Girls from urban area (n = 292) 223.9 ± 164.4
150 * (50–700)
209.9 ± 154.3
200 * (0–800)
179.3 ± 124.3
150 * (0–700)
137.2 ± 112.6
100 *(0–400)
128.6 ± 122
100 (0–300)
0.0724
Girls from suburban area (n = 302) 288.9 ± 108.3
300 (100–400)
217.0 ± 146.3
200 * (0–600)
180.3 ± 123.7
150 * (0–700)
93.8 ± 65.4
100 * (0–300)
76.2 ± 66.9 0.0000
p-Value 0.1368 0.6165 0.9303 0.2340 0.4054

* distribution different than normal (verified using Shapiro—Wilk test—p ≤ 0.05).