Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 23;10(7):948. doi: 10.3390/nu10070948

Table 2.

Energy metabolism and visceral fat mass.

Normal-Control (n = 10) Control (n = 10) Positive-Control (n = 10) AGM-L (n = 10) AGM-H (n = 10)
Body weight gain for 10 week (g) 283 ± 10.5 a 144 ± 10.7 b 169 ± 11.8 b 156 ± 19.1 b 155 ± 13.0 b
Food intake (g/day) 14.4 ± 1.0 a 15.1 ± 0.8 a 15.0 ± 1.0 a 13.4 ± 1.5 b 12.3 ± 1.5 b
Food efficiency 0.30 ± 0.01 a 0.15 ± 0.01 d 0.18 ± 0.12 c 0.19 ± 0.03 c 0.22 ± 0.02 b
Epididymal fat pads (g) 6.7 ± 0.7 a 3.0 ± 0.4 c 2.9 ± 0.3 c 3.8 ± 0.5 b 3.3 ± 0.4 c
Retroperitoneal fat mass (g) 8.1 ± 0.8 a 3.6 ± 0.5 c 3.8 ± 0.5 c 4.3 ± 0.6 b,c 5.0 ± 0.7 b
Visceral fat (g) 14.8 ± 1.6 a 6.7 ± 0.9 c 6.7 ± 0.8 c 8.1 ± 1.0 b 8.3 ± 1.0 b

Food efficiency: daily energy intake/daily weight gain × 100. Values are means ± standard deviation. The test product was the mixture of free-dried aronia, red ginseng, mushroom and nattokinase. Px rats fed a high fat diet supplemented with (1) 0.5 g mixture/kg bw/day (AGM-L), (2) 1 g mixture/kg bw/day (AGM-H), (3) 1 g dextrin/kg bw/day (control), or (4) metformin (120 mg/kg body weight; positive-control) for 12 weeks. Sham-operated rats (normal-control) fed the same diet of control. a,b,c,d Values on the same row with different superscripts were significantly different at p < 0.05.