Table 3.
Nutritional status of the participants according to the level of liking for fat.
| Men | Women | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dislike (n = 1895) | Neither Like nor Dislike (n = 998) | Like (n = 857) | p-Trend | Dislike (n = 2605) | Neither Like nor Dislike (n = 848) | Like (n = 528) | p-Trend | |
| Total energy intake (kcal) | 1947.8 (11.5) | 2000.7 (17.3) | 2111.5 (18.8) | <0.0001 | 1771.4 (9.9) | 1829.6 (18.1) | 1943.6 (24.0) | <0.0001 |
| Nutrient intake | ||||||||
| Carbohydrate (g) | 334.3 (0.6) | 329.9 (0.9) | 326.5 (1.1) | <0.0001 | 341.2 (0.6) | 336.5 (1.1) | 336.6 (1.3) | 0.018 |
| Protein (g) | 64.4 (0.2) | 64.5 (0.3) | 65.5 (0.4) | 0.008 | 64.1 (0.2) | 64.3 (0.4) | 63.6 (0.4) | 0.076 |
| Fat (g) | 31 (0.2) | 32.9 (0.3) | 33.7 (0.3) | <0.0001 | 28.9 (0.2) | 31.2 (0.4) | 30.8 (0.5) | 0.005 |
| Cholesterol (g) | 165.7 (2.2) | 166 (3.0) | 173.4 (3.1) | 0.029 | 168.6 (2.3) | 178.2 (4.2) | 176.8 (5.0) | 0.315 |
| Vitamin C (g) | 113.5 (1.3) | 107.9 (1.7) | 108 (1.9) | 0.007 | 134.6 (1.5) | 132.7 (2.6) | 123.8 (2.9) | 0.002 |
| Fiber (mg) | 6.7 (0.05) | 6.3 (0.1) | 6.4 (0.1) | 0.0003 | 7.3 (0.05) | 7.0 (0.1) | 6.9 (0.1) | <0.0001 |
| Energy distribution | ||||||||
| Carbohydrate (% of total energy) | 70.5 (0.1) | 69.4 (0.2) | 68.2 (0.2) | <0.0001 | 72.7 (0.1) | 71.5 (0.2) | 71.0 (0.3) | <0.0001 |
| Protein (% of total energy) | 13.6 (0.1) | 13.6 (0.1) | 13.9 (0.1) | <0.0001 | 13.3 (0.1) | 13.4 (0.1) | 13.4 (0.1) | 0.699 |
| Fat (% of total energy) | 14.8 (0.1) | 15.8 (0.2) | 16.7 (0.2) | <0.0001 | 13.0 (0.1) | 14.2 (0.2) | 14.6 (0.2) | <0.0001 |
Values were expressed as means (SE). Nutrients were adjusted for total energy intake using residual method. The p-trend was obtained in general linear model analysis with adjustment for age, body mass index, alcohol intake, smoking, exercise, education level, and income status.