Skip to main content
. 2006 May-Jun;26(3):224–227. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2006.224

Table 3.

Relationship between appropriateness of indications and each endoscopic finding.

Appropriate No. (%) Inappropriate No. (%) OR (95%CI)
Clinically relevant 21 (36.2) 6 (27.3) 1.5 (0.51–4.46)
Erosive gastritis 3 (5.2) 2 (9.1) 0.55 (0.09–3.51)
Erosive duodenitis 2 (3.4) 4 (18.2) 0.16 (0.03–0.95)
Esophagitis 12 (20.7) 2 (9.1) 2.61 (0.53–12.75)
Duodenal ulcer (DU) 7 (12.1) 0 0.00
Gastric ulcer 1 (1.7) 0 0.00
Esophageal varices 1 (1.7) 0 0.00
Not clinically relevant 37 (63.8) 16 (72.7) 0.66 (0.19–2.17)
Nonerosive gastritis 46 (79.3) 10 (45.5) 4.6 (1.61–13.18)
Hiatal hernia 11 (19.0) 4 (18.2) 1.05 (0.29–3.73)
Normal 4 (6.9) 5 (22.7) 0.25 (0.06–1.05)
Nonerosive duodenitis 4 (6.9) 1 (4.5) 1.56 (0.16–14.74)
Healed DU 1 (1.7) 0 0.00
Total 58 (100) 22 (100)
*

Sum of percentage is higher than 100% because of more than one endoscopic finding in the same patient.