Skip to main content
. 2013 Nov-Dec;33(6):572–578. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2013.572

Table 4.

Procedural complications for young patients compared to older patients.

Complications Young (n=1595) Old (n=8673) P value

Local complications, n (%)
 Access site occlusion 2 (0.1) 6 (0.1) .36b
 Loss of distal pulse 0 (0.0) 2 (0.0) .18b
 Dissection 3 (0.2) 24 (0.3) .79b
 Pseudoaneurysm 1 (0.1) 7 (0.1) 1.00b
General complications, n (%)
 Periprocedural MI 7 (0.4) 35 (0.4) .83
 Emergency reintervention/PCI 3 (0.2) 19 (0.2) 1.00b
 Bail-out CABG, n (%) 0 (0.0) 6 (0.1) .60b
 Cardiogenic shock, n (%) 8 (0.5) 50 (0.6) .72
 Arrhythmia (VT/VF/Brady), n (%) 9 (0.6) 44 (0.5) .76
TIA/Stroke, n (%) 0 (0.0) 6 (0.1) .60b
Tamponade, n (%) 0 (0.0) 4 (0.1) 1.00b
Contrast reaction, n (%) 1 (0.1) 7 (0.1) 1.00b
New renal impairment, n (%) 0 (0.0) 15 (0.2) .15b

MI: Myocardial infarction, PCI: percutaneous coronary intervention, CABG: coronary artery bypass graft.

P values were calculated for comparisions between young and old, comparing all subcategories except the unknown subcategory for all variables; All P values were calculated using the chi-square test unless stated.

a

Skewed,

b

Fisher exact test;

Percentages for each variable were calculated from the respective totals that included the unknown category apart from the YES and NO categories.