Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 25;66(4):620–636. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syw103

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

The distributions of Inline graphic-split scores for Inline graphic are shown. Scores were computed for all Inline graphic possible splits for a data set of 500 bp generated under the Jukes–Cantor model on the tree in Figure 1 with all branch lengths set to Inline graphic. These distributions are left-tailed, and the mean increases and the standard deviation (SD) decreases as Inline graphic increases. Behavior for other values of Inline graphic is similar. The red dots show the scores for the true Inline graphic-splits in the tree, which are the smallest in the data. (There are no Inline graphic-splits in the tree.) The blue line segment marks the mean. The Inline graphic-axis is the same on all subplots, but the Inline graphic-axis scales differ vastly because Inline graphic increases as Inline graphic varies from Inline graphic to Inline graphic. (See online for color.)