Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 11;19(3):324–332. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntw282

Table 4.

Use of Other Quit Methods at 3 Months by Treatment Arm

Full sample WEB WEB + SN WEB + NRT WEB + SN + NRT
N = 3297 N = 781 N = 745 N = 902 N = 869 Omnibus p valuea
Pamphlet/book, n (%) 465 (16.3) 130 (19.1) 106 (16.6) 117 (14.9) 112 (15.0) .111
Individual counseling, n (%) 67 (2.4) 15 (2.2) 12 (1.9) 23 (2.9) 17 (2.3) .599
Clinic or group counseling, n (%) 62 (2.2) 12 (1.8) 16 (2.5) 21 (2.7) 13 (1.7) .484
Phone counseling, n (%) 143 (5.0) 41 (6.0) 37 (5.8) 38 (4.9) 27 (3.6) .146
Digital intervention (Web/mobile), n (%) 220 (7.7) 59 (8.7) 45 (7.0) 66 (8.4) 50 (6.7) .401
E-cigarettes, n (%) 1060 (37.1) 242 (35.6) 243 (38.0) 307 (39.2) 266 (35.6) .391
Switching to chew tobacco/snuff, n (%) 58 (2.0) 13 (1.9) 15 (2.3) 15 (1.9) 15 (2.0) .936
Switching brands or cut back, n (%) 1020 (35.8) 240 (35.3) 235 (36.7) 289 (36.9) 257 (34.4) .722
Acupuncture, n (%) 24 (0.8) 5 (0.7) 6 (0.9) 7 (0.9) 6 (0.8) .978
Hypnosis, n (%) 63 (2.2) 16 (2.4) 16 (2.5) 15 (1.9) 16 (2.1) .885
Alternative methods, n (%) 209 (7.3) 50 (7.4) 47 (7.3) 57 (7.3) 55 (7.4) .999

The table only includes data from participants who completed the 3-month follow-up assessment.

aSignificance of pairwise contrasts was not assessed, as none of the omnibus tests attained significance at the alpha = 0.05 level.