Table 5.
Three-way ANOVAs testing the contribution of IMP in brief-access lick data (MSG + A + I vs. MSG + A; NaGlu + A + I vs. NaGlu)
| MSG (Series 1) | MSG (Series 2) | NaGlu | MSG (Series 3) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Genotype | F(1,20)=23.48; 0.01 | F(1,20)=11.31; 0.01 | F(1,18)=0.17; 0.68 | F(1,20)=7.86; 0.01 |
| Vehicle | F(2,40)=17.65; 0.01 | F(2,40)=0.55; 0.47 | F(1,18)=0.16; 0.70 | F(2,40)=2.78; 0.11 |
| Concentration | F(5,100)=9.24; 0.01 | F(5,100)=3.86; 0.01 | F(5,90)=0.40; 0.85 | F(5,100)=3.07; 0.01 |
| Genotype x Vehicle | F(2,40)=4.32; 0.05 | F(2,40)=0.11; 0.74 | F(1,18)=8.49; 0.01 | F(2,40)=0.01; 0.98 |
| Genotype x Concentration | F(5,100)=2.23; 0.06 | F(5,100)=3.86; 0.01 | F(5,90)=0.67; 0.65 | F(5,100)=0.93; 0.48 |
| Vehicle x Concentration | F(10,200)=2.87; 0.02 | F(10,200)=0.34; 0.89 | F(5,90)=0.96; 0.45 | F(10,200)=0.38; 0.87 |
| Genotype x Vehicle x Concentration | F(10,200)=0.96; 0.45 | F(10,200)=0.70; 0.63 | F(5,90)=0.44; 0.82 | F(10,200)=1.53; 0.19 |