Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 17;42(5):393–404. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjx015

Table 6.

Three-way ANOVAs testing the contribution of L-glutamate in brief-access lick data (MSG+A+I-2 vs. NaGlu + A + I; MSG+A-2 vs. NaGlu + A)

MSG + A + I vs. NaGlu + A + I MSG + A vs. NaGlu + A
Genotype F(1,18) = 4.61; 0.04 F(1,18) = 0.95; 0.34
Anion F(1,18) = 3.36; 0.08 F(1,18) = 0.56; 0.47
Concentration F(5,90) = 2.18; 0.06 F(5,90) = 0.93; 0.47
Genotype × Anion F(1,18) = 0.03; 0.87 F(1,18) = 5.68; 0.03
Genotype × concentration F(5,90) = 0.93; 0.47 F(5,90) = 0.93; 0.47
Anion × Concentration F(5,90) = 1.34; 0.25 F(5,90) = 1.55; 0.18
Genotype × Anion × Concentration F(5,90) = 0.6; 0.7 F(5,90) = 1.10; 0.37

Bolded values represent statistical significance (P ≤ 0.05).

Data for these analyses can be found in Figures 2 and 3.