Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Obstet Gynecol. 2018 May;131(5):879–890. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002566

Table 2.

Primary indications for cesarean delivery among HIV-infected women with documented indication for cesarean delivery (N=2,886)

Indications for cesarean delivery
Characteristic HIV infection
(N=977)
Arrest
disorder
(N=380)
Maternal
indication
(N=94)
Fetal
indication
(N=661)
Repeat
cesarean
delivery
(N=774)
N (%) N (%) N (%) N (%) N (%)
Guideline Period 1998–1999 153 (32%) 82 (17%) 17 (4%) 153 (32%) 73 (15%)*
2000–2008 710 (40%) 202 (11%) 56 (3%) 381 (22%) 413 (23%)
2009–2013 114 (18%) 96 (15%) 21 (3%) 127 (20%) 288 (45%)
HAART Period Early (1998–2008) 863 (39%) 284 (13%) 73 (3%) 534 (24%) 486 (22%)*
Late (2009–2013) 114 (18%) 96 (15%) 21 (3%) 127 (20%) 288 (45%)
Last plasma viral load before delivery (copies/ml) <1,000 493 (25%) 331 (16%) 60 (3%) 503 (25%) 624 (31%)*
≥1,000 453 (58%) 33 (4%) 32 (4%) 127 (16%) 132 (17%)
Unknown 31 (32%) 16 (16%) 2 (2%) 31 (32%) 18 (18%)
Ruptured membranes in labor No 866 (39%) 167 (8%) 84 (4%) 424 (19%) 671 (30%)*
Yes 87 (15%) 200 (34%) 7 (1%) 215 (36%) 81 (14%)
Unknown 0 13 (22%) 3 (5%) 22 (37%) 22 (37%)
Gestational age at delivery (weeks) <37 111 (20%) 48 (9%) 57 (10%) 218 (39%) 118 (21%)*
≥37 866 (37%) 332 (14%) 37 (2%) 443 (19%) 653 (28%)
Unknown 0 0 0 0 3 (100%)
*

Reflects statistically significant findings with a p-value<0.001. A Chi-square test was used, which tested the difference in indication for cesarean delivery by strata.

This table is a subset of the 2,886 women with an available indication for cesarean delivery among the women who had a cesarean delivery in this cohort (n=3,025).