Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Aug 3.
Published in final edited form as: Gynecol Oncol. 2017 May 28;146(2):405–415. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.05.027

Table 3.

Analysis of SLN metastases from recent studies

Author, year N (with SLN assessment) Macro-metastasis Micro-metastasis ITC (only) Total LN positive
Holloway et al 2016 [67] 119 14 (12%) 10 (8.4%) 12 (10%) 36 (30%)
Touhami et al 2015 [55] 268 24 (9%) 7 (2.6%) 12 (4.5%) 43 (16%)
Desai et al 2014 [41] * 103 5 (4.9%) 5 (4.9%) 10 (9.7%)
Raimond et al 2014 [69] 136 7 (5%) 15 (11%) 22 (16%)
Kim 2013 [45] ** 508 35 (7%) 4 (0.8%) 19 (3.7%) 64 (13%)
Ballester et al 2011 [30] 111 8 (7%) 7 (6.3%) 1 (0.9%) 16 (14%)
OVERALL 1,245 93 (7.5%) 48 (3.9%) 44 (3.5%) 185 (14.9%)
*

IHC positive only (no description of size of metastasis in the SLN)

**

includes 6 patients with positive non-SLN

Abbreviations: SLN = sentinel lymph node; N = number of patients; ITC = isolated tumor cells; LN = lymph node