Table 4.
Data on AEs: Two
| Study | Sample Size | QOL |
LVEF Decline |
Cardiac AEs |
Febrile Neutropenia |
Other Hematologic AEsa |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. | % | No. | % | No. | % | No. | % | No. | % | ||
| First-Line Setting | |||||||||||
| Baselga et al10 (CLEOPATRA; 2012) | Declines ≥ 10% from baseline LVEF < 50%: | LVEF grade ≥ 3: | |||||||||
| Pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and docetaxel | 402 | 3.8b | 5b | 1.2 | 56b | 13.8 | |||||
| Trastuzumab, docetaxel, and placebo | 406 | 6.6b | 11b | 2.8 | 30b | 7.6 | |||||
| Blackwell et al,11 Verma et al12 (EMILIA; 2012) | FACT-B total: | Declines ≥ 10% from baseline resulting in LVEF < 50% in patients assessed after baseline: | Neutropenia: | ||||||||
| T-DM1 | 495 | 7.1 months (n = 450) | 8 | 1.7 | 10 | 2 | |||||
| Lapatinib plus capecitabine | 496 | 4.6 months (n = 445) | 7 | 1.6 | 21 | 4.3 | |||||
| HR, 0.80 | Thrombocytopenia: | ||||||||||
| 95% CI, 0.67 to 0.95 | 63 | 12.9 | |||||||||
| P = .0121c | 1 | 0.212 | |||||||||
| Huober et al7 (eLEcTRA; 2012) | Mean change: | No grade 4 cardiac AEs | |||||||||
| Trastuzumab plus letrozole | 26 | 7b | |||||||||
| Letrozole | 31 | 3b | |||||||||
| Letrozole alone (HER2 negative, hormone receptor positive) | 35 | 1b | |||||||||
| Kaufman et al8 (TAnDEM; 2009) | ≥ 15% from baseline to < 50%: | Grade 3 or 4: | |||||||||
| Trastuzumab plus anastrozole | 103 | 1 | 2 | ||||||||
| Anastrozole | 104 | 0 | 2 | ||||||||
| Schwartzberg et al9 (2010) | FACT-B total: | ||||||||||
| Lapatinib plus letrozole | 111d | 104 | Mean, 99.3 (SD, 19.16) | 3 | |||||||
| Placebo plus letrozole | 108d | 96 | Mean, 101.1 (SD, 19.31) | 1 (asymptomatic)e | |||||||
| Subscale week 12 treatment group difference: | |||||||||||
| 1.5-point difference in favor (BCS) | |||||||||||
| 1.5-point difference in favor (SWB)g | |||||||||||
| P < .05 | |||||||||||
| Andersson et al13 (HERNATA; 2011) | Decline > 14% from baseline: | Leucopenia: | |||||||||
| Trastuzumab plus docetaxel | 143 | 7.2 | Grade 3, 35.2; grade 4, 2.2 | Grade 3, 25.2; grade 4, 15.1 | |||||||
| Trastuzumab plus vinorelbine | 141 | 10.9 | Grade 3: 10.1; grade 4: 0.7 | Grade 3, 12.3; grade 4, 8.7 | |||||||
| P = .40 | P < .001 | P < .001 | |||||||||
| Valero et al14 (BCIRG 007; 2011) | LVEF decline > 15%: | Thrombocytopenia: | |||||||||
| Docetaxel, carboplatin, and trastuzumab | 131 | All grades, 6.7 | 17 | 1g | 2g | 15.3 | |||||
| Docetaxel plus trastuzumab | 131 | 16 | 12.2g | 3g | 2.3 | ||||||
| 5.5 | P = NS | P < .001 | |||||||||
| Inoue et al15 (JO17360; 2010) | Decrease to < 50%: | Leukopenia and neutropenia combined: | |||||||||
| Trastuzumab followed by trastuzumab plus docetaxel | 55 | 2 | 4.1 | No CHF | 2 | 4 | 20 | 36 | |||
| Trastuzumab plus docetaxel | 53 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 32 | 60 | ||||
| Difference between baseline LVEF and lowest LVEF ≥ 10: | |||||||||||
| 12 | 24.5 | ||||||||||
| 11 | 22 | ||||||||||
| Gelmon et al16 (MA.31/GSK EGF108919; 2012)h | Decline < 20% (greatest): | ||||||||||
| Lapatinib plus taxane followed by lapatinib | 318 | Week 60, 28 of 42 (of 312) | 67 | 17 (7 postamendment)i | |||||||
| Trastuzumab plus taxane followed by trastuzumab | 318 | Week 60, 50 of 70 (of 317) | 71 | 7 (6 postamendment)i | |||||||
| Second-Line Setting | |||||||||||
| Cameron et al,17 Geyer et al18 (EGF100151; 2010) | |||||||||||
| Lapatinib plus capecitabine (combination) | 198 | 4 (asymptomatic)j | |||||||||
| Capecitabine (monotherapy) | 201 | 4 (asymptomatic)j | |||||||||
| Blackwell et al19,20 (EGF104900; 2010, 2012) | Time to deterioration: | ||||||||||
| Lapatinib alone | 145 | HR, 0.82 (95% CI, 0.56 to 1.20) | 3 | 3k | |||||||
| Lapatinib plus trastuzumab | 146 | TOI: | 8k,l | 10 (1 fatal event)20k | |||||||
| HR, 0.79 (95% CI, 0.55 to 1.14) | |||||||||||
| BCS time to deterioration: | |||||||||||
| HR, 1.02 (95% CI, 0.69 to 1.52) | |||||||||||
Abbreviations: AE, adverse event; BCS, Breast Cancer Scale; CHF, congestive heart failure; FACT-B, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–General; HR, hazard ratio; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; NCI CTCAE, National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events; QOL, quality of life; SD, standard deviation; SWB, Spiritual Well-Being Scale; T-DM1, trastuzumab emtansine; TOI, Trial Outcome Index.
For example, thrombocytopenia.
Mean LVEF change from baseline to minimum during treatment.
Median time to decrease of ≥ 5 points in FACT-B TOI score was delayed in T-DM1 group.
Two patients randomly assigned to letrozole plus placebo arm actually received letrozole plus lapatinib; thus, safety population reports on 106 and 113 patients, respectively.
LVEF equals space relative reduction in LVEF to ≥ 20% and below institutional normal limit.
Measuring social/family well-being.
All grades.
Interim results.
Protocol amended to require mandatory primary granulocyte colony-stimulating factor prophylaxis for those receiving lapatinib plus taxane followed by lapatinib (after first 189 patients randomly assigned).
NCI CTCAE (version 3.0) grade 3 or 4 left ventricular systolic dysfunction or ≥ 20% absolute decrease in LVEF relative to baseline value and below lower limit of normal of institution.
NCI CTCAE (version 3.0) grade ≥ 3 left ventricular systolic dysfunction or decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction 20% relative to baseline value and below lower limit of normal of institution.
Decrease of ≥ 20% from baseline and < lower limit of normal of institution.