Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 3;9:3047. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05181-w

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Overview of the elastoplastic model. a Cohesive (black line) and cohesionless (dashed gray line) cam clay yield surface in the pq space. The red line corresponds to the Critical State Line. b Illustration of the hardening models p0ϵVP (for the slab) and p0(η) (for the weak layer): the black arrow shows the classical hardening law used for the snow slab in which p0 increases in compression ϵ˙VP<0; the blue arrows represent the new softening model for the weak layer for which p0 decreases under compression η˙=αϵ˙VP>0 until ϵVP=0 after which the classical hardening law is used with β = 0. c Typical pϵV curve obtained for the unconfined compression of the weak layer in experiment number 2 (see Methods section for model parameters) for the classical hardening law (in black) and the new softening one (in blue). d Same as c but for the qϵV curve. In c and d, p and q in the weak layer (blue curves) do not perfectly reach zero after softening due to a loss of homogeneity (failure localization)