Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 20;7(2):e10440. doi: 10.2196/10440

Table 2.

The evaluation of the stroke websites based on Suitability Assessment of Materials.

Category and criteria Frequency, n (%) ICCa Converted %b


Not suitable (0) Adequate (1) Superior (2)

Content





Purpose 0 (0) 8 (19) 34 (81) .626 90.5
Scope 2 (5) 13 (31) 27 (64) .896 79.8
Content topics 6 (14) 25 (60) 11 (26) .875 56.0
Summary and review 23 (55) 8 (19) 11 (26) .993 35.7c
Average



65.5
Literacy demands





Reading grade level 19 (45) 21 (50) 2 (5) .810 29.8c
Writing Style 1 (2) 14 (33) 27 (64) .859 81.0
Sentence construction 1 (2) 17 (41) 24 (57) .727 77.4
Vocabulary 2 (5) 19 (45) 21 (50) .746 72.6
Learning enhancement by advance organizers 6 (14) 3 (7) 33 (79) .962 82.1
Average



68.6
Graphic illustration, lists, tables, and charts




Cover graphic 20 (48) 13 (31) 9 (21) .950 36.9c
Type of illustrations 14 (33) 15 (36) 13 (31) .950 48.8
Relevance of illustrations 15 (36) 11 (26) 16 (38) .975 51.2
Graphical direction: lists, tables, charts, and forms 25 (60) 10 (24) 7 (17) .956 28.6c
Captions are used to announce or explain graphics 14 (33) 17 (41) 11 (26) .976 46.4
Average



42.4
Layout and typography





Typography 1 (2) 9 (21) 32 (76) .863 86.9
Layout 1 (2) 12 (29) 29 (69) .813 83.3
Subheadings and chunking 4 (10) 4 (10) 34 (81) .965 85.7
Average



85.3
Learning, stimulation, and motivation




Interaction included in the text or graphics 16 (38) 15 (36) 11 (26) .967 44.0
Desired behavior patterns are modeled 14 (33) 12 (29) 16 (38) .975 52.4
Motivation 16 (38) 14 (33) 12 (29) .965 45.2
Average



47.2
Cultural appropriateness





Cultural match: logic, language, experience 24 (57) 8 (19) 10 (24) .992 33.3c
Cultural image and examples 29 (69) 10 (24) 3 (7) .987 19.0c
Multiple languages translation 36 (86) 0 (0) 6 (14) .994 14.3c
Average



22.2c
Overall average 55.7

aICC: intraclass correlation coefficient.

bConverted Percent=([n of websites×0 point]+[n of websites×1 point]+[n of websites×2 points])/total possible best score (84=42 websites×2 points)×100. Interpretation: 70%-100%=superior; 40%-69%=adequate; 0%-39% =not suitable.

cInformation rated as “not suitable” per criterion across the evaluated websites.