Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: AIDS Behav. 2018 Sep;22(9):3033–3043. doi: 10.1007/s10461-018-2126-1

Table 4.

Results for the model of structural network position on health leaders’ reported number of past-week conversations about HIV and gender-based violence (GBV)

HIV GBV
β 95% CI β 95% CI
Intercept 1.72*** (0.94, 2.49) 0.82** (0.26, 1.38)
Individual-level covariates
 Gender −0.94** (−1.6, −0.28) −0.45 (−1.06, 0.15)
 Age 0.00 (−0.28, 0.27) 0.01 (−0.29, 0.31)
 Education 0.15 (−0.06, 0.37) 0.10 (−0.08, 0.27)
 Marital history 0.06 (−0.19, 0.31) 0.05 (−0.26, 0.36)
 Sexually active −0.09 (−0.37, 0.19) 0.00 (−0.30, 0.29)
 HIV testing 0.17 (−0.05, 0.40) 0.09 (−0.17, 0.35)
 Confidence in Educating 0.04 (−0.19, 0.27) 0.22** (0.06, 0.38)
Network-level covariates
 Network size 0.31** (0.11, 0.50) 0.13 (−0.08, 0.33)
 Percent of male members −0.09 (−0.38, 0.19) −0.10 (−0.36, 0.16)
 Percent of friendship ties −0.06 (−0.28, 0.16) −0.04 (−0.25, 0.17)
 Density of friendship ties −0.03 (−0.68, 0.62) −0.18 (−0.81, 0.45)
 Reciprocity of friendship ties 0.20 (−0.55, 0.96) 0.33 (−0.41, 1.07)
Structural network position
 In-degree centrality −0.18* (−0.34, −0.03) −0.16 (−0.32, 0.01)
 Betweenness centrality 0.05 (−0.09, 0.19) 0.15* (0.00, 0.29)
*

p<0.05;

**

p<0.01;

***

p<0.001