Table 1.

Ranking of CHIs for different outcomes based on SUCRA.

Intervention		CKZ+WM	CXQ+WM	DH+WM	HQ+WM	RDN+WM	SF+WM	SM+WM	SMI+WM	TRQ+WM	XBJ+WM	XXN+WM	XYP+WM	WM
RCE	SUCRA(%)	32.4	69.4	85.5	76.7	54.5	19.1	59.5	39.5	55.2	51.6	67.8	38.8	0
	N	9	9	13	6	10	7	12	6	48∗	22	7	7	154
	Rank	11	3	1	2	7	12	5	9	6	8	4	10	13
FEV1%	SUCRA(%)	43.3	49.2	51.9	69	75.1	47.8	76.6	-	41.9	58.8	-	20.1	16.2
	N	3	2	1	2	4	4	6	-	7	4	-	2	35
	Rank	8	6	5	3	2	7	1	-	9	4	-	10	11
FEV1/FVC	SUCRA(%)	45.8	56.1	30.4	48.2	73.63	52.1	66.9	-	58.3	67.6	-	30.9	20.1
	N	1	1	1	1	4	4	5	-	9∗	7	-	2	34
	Rank	8	5	10	7	1	6	3	-	4	2	-	9	11
PaCO2	SUCRA(%)	32.8	49.2	-	59.1	75.2	50.7	54.9	83.6	43.4	35	48.7	51.3	16.1
	N	3	4	-	1	2	2	3	2	14	7	1	1	40
	Rank	11	7	-	3	2	6	4	1	9	10	8	5	12
PaO2	SUCRA(%)	45.2	45.9	-	60.9	71.9	47.4	51	56.1	49.3	30.9	73.8	53.2	14.4
	N	3	4	-	1	2	2	3	2	14	7	1	1	40
	Rank	10	9	-	3	2	8	6	4	7	11	1	5	12
pH	SUCRA(%)	-	40.3	-	-	70	49.3	58.4	-	51.3	48.4	61	-	21.3
	N	-	2	-	-	2	4	3	-	11	5	1	-	28
	Rank	-	7	-	-	1	5	3	-	4	6	2	-	8
CRP	SUCRA(%)	45.9	-	52.2	60.6	53	-	37	57.4	63.3	51.3	59.2	48.8	21.3
	N	1	-	1	1	4	-	1	3	10	11	1	3	36
	Rank	9	-	6	2	5	-	10	4	1	7	3	8	11
WBCC	SUCRA(%)	50.4	-	-	-	67	-	-	58	43.1	59.6	-	45.1	26.8
	N	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	1	8	7	-	2	20
	Rank	4	-	-	-	1	-	-	3	6	2	-	5	7
N%	SUCRA(%)	84.1	-	-	-	-	-	-	66.1	29.7	56.5	-	43.5	20.2
	N	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	5	6	-	2	15
	Rank	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	5	3	-	4	6

N, number of RCTs; ∗, it includes a direct comparison, that is, TRQ combining with WM versus XYP combining with WM.