Table 7.

Factors affecting neonatal outcome using multivariate logistic regression among mothers who gave birth by OVD in JUMC December 1, 2016–May 30, 2017.

Variables with category		Neonatal outcome		Crude OR(95% CI)	AOR(95%CI)	P value
		Fav	Unfav
Place of the residency	Jimma Town	90	8	2.250(.966,5.241)	.653(.176,2.429)	0.525
	Outside Jimma town	120	24	1	1
Occupation	Housewife	95	6	1	1
	civil servant	33	6	.347(.105, 1.152)	0.282(.062,1.278)	0.101
	Farmer	64	18	.225(.085, .596)	0.299(.061,1.462)	0.136
	Merchant	9	2	.284(.050, 1.620)	0.221(.029,1.692)	0.146
	Other	9	0	1.020(.000,2.310)	1.110(.000,3.23)	0.999
Income of the family per month	500 ETB and below	9	1	1.000(.118, 8.487)	4.650(.248,87.109	0.304
	501-1742 ETB	103	25	1	1
	above 1742	98	6	.490(229, 1.051)	1.551(.325, 7.397)	0.582
Parity	I	146	22	1	1
	II-IV	51	2	3.842(.873,16.917)	2.719(.525,14.070)	0.233
	≥V	13	8	.245(.091, .658)	0.294(.072, 1.197)	0.088
Indication for OVD	NRFHRP	115	21	1	1
	shortening SSOL	44	4	2.009(.653, 6.183)	0.698(.155, 3.146)	0.640
	prolonged SSOL	51	7	1.330(.532, 3.328)	0.906(.198, 4.143)	0.899
Type of OVD used∗	Vacuum	34	16	.193(.088, .423)	0.228(0.078, 0.671)	0.007
	Forceps	176	16	1	1
Type of OVD applied	Low	110	22	1	1
	Outlet	100	10	2.000(.903, 4.429)	1.604(.577, 4.458)	0.365
Time of application	on arrival	52	17	.290(.136, .622)	0.436(.118, 1.615)	0.214
	Followed	158	15	1	1
Status of liquor∗	Clear	163	9	1	1
	G1MSAF	17	2	.469(.094, 2.352)	0.574(.081, 4.088)	0.579
	G2MSAF	13	4	.179(.049, .663)	0.163(.031, .858)	0.032
	G3MSAF	17	17	.055(.021, .143)	0.088(.024, .327)	0.000

∗ shows significant predictor variable with p<0.05.