Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 15;2018:7465126. doi: 10.1155/2018/7465126

Table 1.

Statistical analysis of LI-RADS scale for different cut-off points and ESGAR.

Cut-off Sensitivity Specificity Accuracy AUC PPV NPV
% (N)  
[95%CI]
% (N)  
[95%CI]
% (N) PE 
[95%CI]
% (N)  
[95%CI]
% (N)  
[95%CI]

LR 4 96.0 (48/50)
[86.3-99.5]
75.0 (15/20)
[50.9-91.3]
88.6 (63/70) 85.5 
[75.4-95.6]
90.6 (48/53)  
[79.3-96.9]
88.2 (15/17)  
[63.6-98.5]

LR = 5 74.0 (37/50)
[59.7-85.4]
95.0 (19/20)
[75.1-99.9]
80.0 (56/70) 84.5
[76.6-92.4]
97.4 (37/38)
[86.2-99.9]
59.4 (19/32)
[40.6-76.3]

ESGAR major + add. feat. 88.0 (44/50)
[75.7-95.5]
75.0 (15/20)
[50.9-91.3]
84.3 (59/70) 81.5
[70.8-92.2]
89.8 (44/49)
[77.8-96.6]
71.4 (15/21)
[47.8-88.7]

ESGAR major feat. 78.0 (39/50)
[64.0-88.4]
80.0 (16/20)
[56.3-94.3]
78.6 (55/70) 79.0
[68.3-89.7]
90.7 (39/43)
[77.9-97.4]
59.3 (16/27)
[38.8-77.6]

CI = confidence interval; PE = point estimate.