Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Aug 5.
Published in final edited form as: IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2018 Feb 14;37(8):1822–1834. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2018.2806309

Table VI.

Confidence intervals on the change in segmentation metrics (positive for Dice scores and negative for the boundary distances when DenseVNet is better) for the algorithm comparison.

Spleen Left Kidney Gallbladder Esophagus Liver Stomach Pancreas Duodenum
Dice coefficient (%)

DEEDS+JLF 0.03,0.09 0.01,0.03 0.03,0.18 0.04,0.12 0.01,0.03 0.02,0.08 -0.00,0.08 -0.01,0.09
VoxResNet 0.04,0.05 0.03,0.05 0.00,0.05 0.03,0.09 0.01,0.01 0.02,0.04 0.02,0.05 0.01,0.05
VNet 0.01,0.03 0.01,0.03 0.04,0.12 0.02,0.09 0.01,0.02 0.02,0.07 0.04,0.10 0.03,0.09

Mean boundary distance (mm)

DEEDS+JLF -1.8,-0.5 -0.5,-0.2 -1.5,-0.1 -0.7,-0.1 -0.9,-0.1 -1.3,-0.2 -0.8,0.1 -0.9,0.3
VoxResNet -1.1,-0.8 -0.8,-0.5 -0.5,-0.1 -0.7,-0.3 -0.5,-0.2 -0.8,-0.3 -0.5,-0.2 -0.5,0.2
VNet -0.5,-0.2 -0.4,-0.2 -1.4,-0.4 -0.7,-0.2 -0.8,-0.3 -1.7,-0.2 -1.1,-0.4 -1.1,-0.1

95% Hausdorff distance (mm)

DEEDS+JLF -3.5,-0.7 -0.7,0.2 -4.2,-1.1 -1.6,0.0 -1.2,0.1 -4.9,-0.0 -1.7,0.1 -1.9,1.9
VoxResNet -1.7,-1.0 -1.2,-0.5 -1.0,0.3 -1.0,-0.0 -0.6,0.1 -1.2,0.2 -1.3,-0.1 -1.7,2.1
VNet -1.7,-0.5 -1.2,-0.1 -3.4,-0.7 -1.5,-0.3 -1.8,-0.5 -5.0,-0.3 -4.1,-1.1 -3.0,0.4