Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 18;2018:5325032. doi: 10.1155/2018/5325032

Table 2.

Implant distribution and number of failures and complications registered in the two groups (digital versus analog procedures).

All implants Treatment procedure p-value ∗
Digital Analog
N 50 25 25 -

Implant location

Maxilla 15/50 (30%) 6/25 (24%) 9/25 (36%) 0.35
Mandible 35/50 (70%) 19/25 (76%) 16/25 (64%)

Implant position

Premolars 22/50 (44%) 10/25 (40%) 12/25 (48%) 0.57
Molars 28/50 (56%) 15/25 (60%) 13/25 (52%)

Implant length

8 mm 7/50 (14%) 2/25 (8%) 5/25 (20%) 0.39
10 mm 32/50 (64%) 18/25 (72%) 14/25 (56%)
12 mm 11/50 (22%) 5/25 (20%) 6/25 (24%)

Implant diameter

4.1 mm 42/50 (84%) 20/25 (80%) 22/25 (88%) 0.44
4.8 mm 8/50 (16%) 5/25 (20%) 3/25 (12%)

Implant failures 0/50 (0%) 0/0 (0%) 0/0 (0%) ne

Biologic complications 3/50 (6%) 1/25 (4%) 2/25 (8%) 0.55

Prosthetic complications 1/50 (2%) 1/25 (4%) 0/25 (0%) 0.31

Implant-crown success 46/50 (92%) 23/25 (92%) 23/25 (92%) 1.0

N = number of the fixtures examined.

= Chi-square test.

ne: not estimable (no observed failures).