Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 9;5(4):197–211. doi: 10.1093/rb/rby013

Table 2.

Schematic representations of the reviewed incorporation strategies and their resulting growth factor release profiles

Incorporation strategy Schematic Release profile [72] Advantages (+) and limitations (−)
Covalent binding graphic file with name rby013ilf1.jpg graphic file with name rby013ilf2.jpg
  • + No GF diffusion out of scaffold

  • − Loss of GF bioactivity

Physical entrapment/ Adsorption graphic file with name rby013ilf3.jpg graphic file with name rby013ilf4.jpg
  • + GF bioactivity maintained

  • − Diffusion and degradation mediated release

  • − Rapid burst release

  • − Difficult to control release rate

Incorporation into micro/nanospheres graphic file with name rby013ilf5.jpg graphic file with name rby013ilf6.jpg
  • + Better control of GF release rate

  • + Possibility for sequential release of multiple GFs

  • − Additional fabrication steps

  • − Can rely on use of harsh chemicals

Inline graphic = covalent bond; Inline graphic = growth factor; Inline graphic = micro/nanocapsule.