Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 1;10:2289–2301. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S170105

Table 1.

The efficacy and toxicities of combinatorial therapeutic strategies of RAF inhibitors in BRAFm CRC patients

Strategies Drugs N BRAF-V600E (%) Efficacy
Toxicities (%)
ORR (%) mPFS (months) (95% CI) mOS (months) (95% CI) Fatigue Diarrhea Vomiting/nausea Rash Lipase increase Dry skin Dermatitis acneiform Abdominal pain Arthralgia
Doublet
BRAF + EGFR Cetuximab + vemurafenib53 27 89 4 3.7 (1.8–5.1) 7.1 (4.4–NR) 52 44 26 74 22 44
Vemurafenib + panitumumab15 15 100 13 3.2 (1.6–5.3) 7.6 (2.1–NR) 34 7 14 53 27 7 26
Dabrafenib + panitumumab76 20 100 10 3.5 (NA) 13.2 (NA) 50 45 50 60 40 60
Encorafenib + cetuximab (Phase I)56 26 96 19 3.7 (2.8–12) NA 50 19 46 19 19 11 31 4
Encorafenib + cetuximab (Phase II)75 50 NA 22 4.2 (3.4–5.4) NR 50 21 46 17 18 12 42
BRAF + MEK Dabrafenib + trametinib54 43 100 12 3.5 (3.4–4) NA 53 35 63
Triplet
BRAF + MEK + EGFR Dabrafenib + trametinib + panitumumab76 91 100 21 4.2 (4.1–5.6) 9.1 (7.6–20) 49 65 56 36 54 59
BRAF + MEK + PI3K Encorafenib + cetuximab + alpelisib (Phase I)56 28 96 18 4.2 (4.1–5.4) NA 43 54 50 36 32 29 25
Encorafenib + cetuximab + alpelisib (Phase II)75 52 NA 27 5.4 (4.1–7.2) 15.2 (NA) 46 54 56 27 8 20 40
BRAF + EGFR + irinotecan Vemurafenib + cetuximab + irinotecan (Phase I)80 19 100 35 7.7 (3.1–NR) NA 89 84 79 74 42
Vemurafenib + cetuximab + irinotecan (Phase II)81 54 100 16 4.4 (3.6–5.7) NA 15a 22a

Note:

a

Grade 3/4 adverse events.

Abbreviations: BRAFm, BRAF mutation; CI, confidence interval; CRC, colorectal cancer; mPFS, median progression-free survival; mOS, median overall survival; NA, not available; NR, not reached; ORR, objective response rate.