Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 15;5(1):11–26. doi: 10.2217/cns.15.38

Table 1. . Patient characteristics in bevacizumab-naive and bevacizumab-refractory groups.

Patient characteristics Bev-naive group 1 (n = 73) Bev-refractory group 2 (n = 25)

  Rindo + bev (n = 36) Control + bev (n = 37)  
Age, years:      
 – Median (range) 59 (44–79) 55 (30–75) 58 (39–79)
 – ≥50 years, n (%) 35 (97%) 27 (73%) 15 (75%)

Sex, n (%):      
 – Female 17 (47%) 15 (41%) 9 (36%)
 – Male 19 (53%) 22 (59%) 16 (64%)

KPS (%):      
 – ≥80 80.5% 81% 56%
 – <80 19.4% 18.9% 44%

Recurrence, n (%):      
 – 1st 33 (92%)§ 28 (76%) 4 (16%)
 – 2nd 3 (8%)§ 9 (24%) 21 (84%)

Surgery after last recurrence, n (%):      
 – Gross total resection 14 (39%)§ 6 (16%) 3 (15%)
 – Subtotal resection/biopsy/unspecified 1 (3%)§ 4 (11%) 2 (10%)

Primary GBM, n (%) 35 (97%) 35 (95%) 25 (100%)

On steroids at study entry, n (%) 18 (50%) 19 (51%) 7 (28%)

Time from diagnosis to study day 1, months, median (range) 10.8 (3.7–55.2)§ 11.6 (4.7–38.3) 16 (8.4–58.6)

Symbols are present to depict weighted favorability of characteristics toward rindopepimut-treated subgroup as compared with control-treated subgroup within group 1. The symbols are not intended to demonstrate a statistically calculated weight.

Favors rindopepimut.

Even distribution.

§Favors control.

Bev: Bevacizumab; KPS: Karnofsky performance status; Rindo: Rindopepimut.