Table 3.

Work-related factors and MDD, GAD and alcohol abuse, Héraclès study, France, 2014

	MDD/GAD (n=1782)						Alcohol (n=1776)
	Unadjusted			Adjusted			Unadjusted			Adjusted
	RR*	95% CI	P values	RR†	95% CI	P values	RR*	95% CI	P values	RR‡	95% CI	P values
Work intensity	1.46	(1.35 to 1.57)	<0.01	1.16	(1.06 to 1.27)	<0.01	1.31	(1.14 to 1.50)	<0.01	1.16	(0.97 to 1.38)	0.10
Emotional demands	1.53	(1.43 to 1.64)	<0.01	1.24	(1.13 to 1.35)	<0.01	1.40	(1.23 to 1.59)	<0.01	1.16	(0.97 to 1.38)	0.10
Autonomy	0.68	(0.63 to 0.73)	<0.01	0.94	(0.85 to 1.04)	0.26	0.72	(0.63 to 0.83)	<0.01	0.82	(0.67 to 0.99)	0.05
Conflict in values	1.45	(1.35 to 1.56)	<0.01	1.06	(0.96 to 1.17)	0.26	1.30	(1.14 to 1.49)	<0.01	1.16	(0.96 to 1.40)	0.13
Social relations at work	0.61	(0.56 to 0.66)	<0.01	0.78	(0.70 to 0.87)	<0.01	0.83	(0.72 to 0.96)	0.01	1.25	(1.01 to 1.53)	0.03
Job insecurity	1.13	(1.05 to 1.22)	<0.01	1.03	(0.95 to 1.11)	0.49	1.14	(1.00 to 1.30)	0.05	0.95	(0.82 to 1.11)	0.52

For MDD/GAD model explained variance was 0.21 and 0.11 for alcohol model.

Multilevel Poisson regression models.

*No adjustment: each occupational factor is studied one at the time.

†Adjusted on: each occupational factors, age, gender, occupational grade, previous mental health problems/disorders, alcohol abuse, material deprivation and GP’s gender.

‡Adjusted on: each occupational factors, age, gender, occupational grade, family status, company size, previous mental health problems/disorders, job instability, education level, past unemployment, GAD and MDD.

GAD, generalised anxiety disorder; GP, general practitioner; MDD, major depressive disorder; RR, relative risk.

Bold values correspond to significant results.