Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 6;13(8):e0201641. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201641

Table 5. Results of multiple regression analysis.

Received support as moderator of relation between PTG and positive affect and negative affect.

Dependent Block Predictor Assessment β ΔR2
Positive affect First Stable Relationship Third -.22 (-.44÷-.01) .05
Second CD4 Third .01 (-.26÷.21) -
HIV Duration Third -.03 (-.36÷.55)
ARV Duration Third -.07 (-.54÷.34)
HIV/AIDS Status Third -.09 (-.36÷.13)
Third Stable Relationship Third -.21 (-.40÷-.02) .22
+Positive Affect First .47 (.28÷.66)
Fourth Stable Relationship Third -.15 (-.35÷.04) .04
Positive Affect First .42 (.20÷.61)
+PTG First .15 (-.06÷.34)
+ Actually Received Support Second .15 (-.07÷.34)
Fifth Stable Relationship Third -.12 (-.36÷.03) .04
Positive Affect First .40 (.18÷.57)
PTG First .17 (-.03÷.37)
Actually Received Support Second .19 (-.07÷.33)
+PTG x Actually Received Support First/Second .20 (.01÷.38)
Negative affect First Gender First .27 (.06÷.49) .07
Second CD4 Third .09 (-.17÷.30) -
HIV Duration Third .04 (-.26÷.64)
ARV Duration Third -.03 (-.54÷.34)
HIV/AIDS Status Third .07 (-.11÷.38)
Third Gender First .25 (.04÷.47) .02
Negative Affect First .14 (-.07÷.36)
Fourth Gender First .24 (.01÷.47) .01
Negative Affect First .15 (-.09÷.36)
PTG First .03 (-.19÷.27)
Actually Received Support Second .05 (-.29÷.15)
Fifth Gender First .23 (-.01÷.48) .01
Negative Affect First .15 (-.09÷.36)
PTG First .03 (-.19÷.28)
Actually Received Support Second .04 (-.29÷.15)
PTG x Actually Received Support First/Second -.07 (-.20÷.23)

Note:β–Standardized Regression Coefficients with 95% Confidence Intervals; ΔR2 –Change of the Variance Explained.