Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 6;13(8):e0201641. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201641

Table 6. Results of multiple regression analysis.

Provided support as moderator of relation between PTG and positive affect and negative affect.

Dependent Block Predictor Assessment β ΔR2
Positive affect First Stable Relationship Third -.22 (-.44÷-.01) .05
Second CD4 Third .01 (-.26÷.21) -
HIV Duration Third -.03 (-.36÷.55)
ARV Duration Third -.07 (-.54÷.34)
HIV/AIDS Status Third -.09 (-.36÷.13)
Third Stable Relationship Third -.21 (-.40÷-.02) .23
Positive Affect First .47 (.28÷.67)
Fourth Stable Relationship Third -.16 (-.38÷.03) .03
Positive Affect First .41 (.22÷.63)
PTG First .13 (-.06÷.34)
Provided Support Second .13 (-.17÷.27)
Fifth Stable Relationship Third -.15 (-.39÷.03) .01
Positive Affect First .40 (.20÷.63)
PTG First .13 (-.06÷.35)
Provided Support Second .14 (-.17÷.27)
PTG x Provided Support First/Second .05 (-.19÷.24)
Negative Affect First Gender First .27 (.06÷.49) .07
Second CD4 Third .09 (-.17÷.30) -
HIV Duration Third .04 (-.26÷.64)
ARV Duration Third -.03 (-.54÷34)
HIV/AIDS Status Third .07 (-.11÷.38)
Third Gender First .25 (.04÷.47) .02
Negative Affect First .14 (-.07÷.36)
Fourth Gender First .25 (.02÷.49) .01
Negative Affect First .15 (-.08÷.36)
PTG First .04 (-.19÷.28)
Provided Support Second -.04 (-.30÷.16)
Fifth Gender First .26 (.01÷.48) .01
Negative Affect First .14 (-.08÷.36)
PTG First .05 (-.18÷.29)
Provided Support Second -.06 (-.30÷.16)
PTG x Provided Support First/Second -.07 (-.17÷.31)

Note: β–Standardized Regression Coefficients with 95% Confidence Intervals; ΔR2 –Change of the Variance Explained.