Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES
Sigmoid gangrene develops in 6.1% to 93.4% of sigmoid volvulus (SV) cases, and increases the mortality rate from 0% to 40% without bowel gangrene to 3.7% to 80%. This study aimed to investigate factors that induce bowel gangrene development in SV patients.
DESIGN AND SETTINGS
Retrospective study from a single center.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
We determined whether there was any correlation between sigmoid gangrene and the following factors: age, gender, a previous history of a volvulus, previous history of abdominal surgery, pregnancy, major comorbidities, shock, duration of symptoms, direction and degree of rotation of volvulus, and ileosigmoid knotting.
RESULTS
Of 442 patients, 271 (61.3%) had sigmoid gangrene. The presence of pregnancy was negatively correlated with sigmoid gangrene development (P<.05), while comorbid diseases (P<.01), associated shock (P<.01), prolonged symptom duration (P<.05), overrotation (P<.05), and associated ileosigmoid knotting (P<.01) were positively correlated with bowel gangrene. However, no correlation was observed between sigmoid gangrene and the other studied factors.
CONCLUSION
An inverse correlation between pregnancy and sigmoid gangrene was observed. On the other hand, a positive correlation was noted between bowel gangrene and comorbid diseases, shock, prolonged duration of symptoms, overrotation, and associated ileosigmoid knotting.
Sigmoid volvulus (SV), the wrapping of the sigmoid colon around itself and its mesentery, is an unusual but serious type of intestinal obstruction. 1 Both luminal obstruction and vascular occlusion are important pathophysiological consequences that arise in SV. Increased intracolonic pressure that decreases capillary perfusion coupled with mechanical occlusion, and vessel thrombosis contribute to mucosal ischemia, resulting in bowel gangrene.1,2
Sigmoid gangrene develops in 6.1% to 93.4% of SV cases.3–7 In SV, prognostic risk factors like advanced age, comorbid diseases, shock, delayed presentation, and sigmoid overrotation are well documented.3,8,9 Bowel gangrene has been associated with increased mortality. 8,9 However, the risk factors for bowel gangrene development have not been thoroughly investigated in SV.10 In this article, we report on our 45.5 years of experience with a total of 442 SV cases treated surgically, in Eastern Anatolia, Turkey, a region in which SV is endemic.9,10
PATIENTS AND METHODS
We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of 442 patients with sigmoid volvuli, including 271 patients with bowel gangrene surgically treated under emergency conditions at the Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Ataturk University over a 45.5-year period from June 1966 to January 2012. Age, gender, history of a volvulus, previous history of abdominal surgery, pregnancy, major comorbidities, shock, duration of symptoms, direction and degree of rotation, and ileosigmoid knotting were studied to determine any correlations with sigmoid gangrene.
The chi-square test or Fisher exact test were used for statistical analysis, statistical significance was set at P<.05, and odds ratio estimates were given with 95% confidence intervals.
RESULTS
In this series, 271 (61.3%) of the 442 patients with SV had sigmoid gangrene. In 93 of 271 gangrenous volvuli (34.3%), sigmoid gangrene was diagnosed utilizing rectal digital examination by determining melanotic stool, while endoscopic examination demonstrated bowel gangrene in 37 patients (13.7%), and sigmoid gangrene was diagnosed at laparotomy in the remainding 141 patients (52.0%). The presence of pregnancy (P<.05) was negatively correlated with sigmoid gangrene development, while major comorbid diseases (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, coronary disease, cardiac failure, diabetes mellitus, chronic renal insufficiency, hemiplegia, and Parkinson’s disease) (P<.01), the presence of toxic and/or hypovolemic shock (P<.01), prolonged symptom duration (P<.05), overrotation (P<.05), and the presence of ileosigmoid knotting (P<.01) were positively correlated with bowel gangrene. However, no correlation was found between sigmoid gangrene and the other criteria evaluated, including being 60 years of age or older, gender, history of volvulus, previous abdominal surgery, and direction of rotation (P<.05). In this series, 58 of 271 patients (21.4%) died. The findings and results of the statistical analyses are presented in Table 1.
Table 1.
Criteria | Patient | Gangrene | Statistical analysis | OR with 95% CI |
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Under 60 years of age (RC) | 217 | 128 (59.0%) | Chi-squared test, P: .324 Non-significant |
1.21 (0.83–1.78) |
60 years of age and older | 225 | 143 (63.6%) | ||
Male | 364 | 225 (61.8%) | Chi-squared test, P: .640 Non-significant |
1.13 (0.68–1.85) |
Female (RC) | 78 | 46 (59.0%) | ||
No history of volvulus | 320 | 198 (61.9%) | Chi-squared test, P: .694 Non-significant |
1.09 (0.71–1.67) |
History of volvulus (RC) | 122 | 73 (59.8%) | ||
No history of abdominal surgery (RC) | 371 | 225 (60.6%) | Chi-squared test, P: .512 Non-significant |
1.19 (0.70–2.03) |
History of abdominal surgery | 71 | 46 (64.8%) | ||
No pregnancy | 69 | 44 (63.8%) | Fisher exact test, P: .028 Significanta |
6.16 (1.19–31.96) |
Presence of pregnancy (RC) | 9 | 2 (22.2%) | ||
No comorbid disease (RC) | 328 | 189 (57.6%) | Chi-squared test, P: .007 Highly significant |
1.88 (1.19–3.00) |
Presence of comorbid disease | 114 | 82 (71.9%) | ||
No shock (RC) | 337 | 187 (55.5%) | Chi-squared test, P: .000 Highly significant |
3.21 (1.90–5.42) |
Presence of shock | 105 | 84 (80.0%) | ||
Symptom period <24 hrs (RC) | 88 | 45 (51.1%) | Chi-squared test, P: .029 Significant |
1.69 (1.05–2.70) |
Symptom period ≥24 hrs | 354 | 226 (63.8%) | ||
Volvulus in clockwise direction (RC) | 167 | 101 (60.5%) | Chi-squared test, P: .821 Non-significantb |
1.05 (0.68–1.62) |
Volvulus in counterclockwise direction | 180 | 111 (61.7%) | ||
Volvulus degree <360° (RC) | 102 | 52 (51.0%) | Chi-squared test, P: .013 Significantb |
1.81 (1.13–2.89) |
Volvulus degree ≥360° | 245 | 160 (65.3%) | ||
No ileosigmoid knotting (RC) | 442 | 271 (61.3%) | Chi-squared test, P: .001 Highly significantc |
2.66 (1.44–4.91) |
Presence of ileosigmoid knotting | 73 | 59 (80.8%) |
OR: Odds ratio, CI: Confidence interval, RC: Reference category
In 78 female patients,
In 212 patients for whom information was available,
Sigmoid colon and/or ileum gangrene.
DISCUSSION
Sigmoid gangrene is a potentially catastrophic complication of SV and develops in 6.1% to 30.2% of all SV cases and 10.7% to 93.4% of surgically treated SV cases, as shown in Table 2.3–7,9–18 In SV, volume loss into the obstructive bowel lumen leads to hypovolemia as well as mucosal ischaemic injury; necrosis facilitates bacterial translocation and the absorption of toxic products, resulting in toxemia.1,2 Thus, the mortality rate increases from 0% to 40% in SV to 3.7–80% in SV with bowel gangrene.3–7,9,10,14,16,18
Table 2.
Author | Year | Characteristic | Patient | Gangrene % | Mortality % | Mortality % in nongangrenous cases | Mortality % in gangrenous cases |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
Bhatnagar et al3 | 2004 | Surgically treated | 76 | 93.4 | 42.1 | 40.0 | 42.3 |
Ballantyne4 | 1982 | All | 299 | 10.6 | 80.0 | ||
Ballantyne et al5 | 1985 | All | 59 | 6.8 | 6.8 | 6.1 | 25.0 |
Pahlman et al6 | 1989 | All | 60 | 10.0 | 15.0 | 11.1 | 50.0 |
Surgically treated | 28 | 10.7 | 21.4 | 20.0 | 33.3 | ||
Safioleas et al7 | 2007 | All | 33 | 6.1 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 50.0 |
Surgically treated | 7 | 28.6 | 14.3 | 0.0 | 50.0 | ||
Oren et al9 | 2007 | All | 827 | 30.2 | 8.1 | 2.6 | 20.8 |
Surgically treated | 393 | 63.6 | 15.8 | 7.0 | 20.8 | ||
Atamanalp et al10 | 2008 | Surgically treated | 420 | 63.1 | 16.2 | 6.5 | 21.9 |
Khanna et al11 | 1999 | Surgically treated | 111 | 36.0 | 6.3 | ||
Grossmann et al12 | 2000 | All | 228 | 25.9 | 13.6 | ||
Surgically treated | 178 | 33.1 | 14.0 | ||||
De et al13 | 2003 | Surgically treated | 197 | 11.7 | 1.0 | ||
Raveenthiran14 | 2004 | Surgically treated | 57 | 47.4 | 3.5 | 3.3 | 3.7 |
Heis et al15 | 2008 | All | 32 | 9.4 | 6.3 | ||
Surgically treated | 7 | 42.9 | 28.6 | ||||
Nuhu et al16 | 2010 | Surgically treated | 48 | 45.8 | 10.4 | 3.8 | 18.2 |
Mulas et al17 | 2010 | All | 64 | 9.4 | 14.1 | ||
Surgically treated | 41 | 14.6 | 22.0 | ||||
Atamanalp et al18 | 2011 | All | 901 | 29.6 | 8.2 | 2.5 | 21.7 |
Present series | 2012 | Surgically treated | 442 | 61.3 | 16.1 | 7.6 | 21.4 |
Bhatnagar et al3 found no correlation between age and sigmoid gangrene when comparing patients less than 60 years of age with greater than 60 years of age; they also found no correlation between gender and bowel gangrene. Similarly, Raveenthiran14 reported that there was no significant difference between the gangrenous and viable groups in mean age or gender. Our series had similar characteristics. Although advanced age is a known risk factor for increased mortality in SV,10 and an increased rate of bowel gangrene is expected in elderly patients due to vascular pathologies and other associated diseases, this hypothesis has not been confirmed by previous reports and was not been confirmed in the present study.
According to Bhatnagar et al,3 patients experiencing bowel gangrene did not have a greater incidence of previous volvulus. Our study showed similar results concerning the relationship between volvulus history and abdominal surgery and sigmoid gangrene. However, the clinical appearance of SV and incidence of bowel gangrene in pregnant SV cases is controversial. Kolusari et al19 found sigmoid gangrene in all of four pregnant SV patients. In contrast, Atamanalp et al20 reported a bowel gangrene incidence rate of 22.2% in a series of nine pregnant SV patients, which was less than that of the non-pregnant SV patients. Some authors have asserted that the diagnosis of SV is often delayed because the pregnancy itself clouds the clinical picture. Some clinical SV symptoms can occur in normal pregnancies, and an x-ray examination is generally avoided due to the risk of radiation to the fetus.19,21,22 Other studies have suggested that the enlarged uterus narrows the intra-abdominal area, which may cause symptoms to appear earlier and complications to be less frequently observed.20 Interestingly, in the present study, there was an inverse correlation between pregnancy and sigmoid gangrene. In our opinion, some pregnant patients may present clinical symptoms earlier than those without pregnancy due to the dramatic clinical signs caused by the narrowed intra-abdominal area.
Although Bhatnagar et al3 reported no correlation between shock and sigmoid gangrene, Raveenthiran14 revealed a high incidence of circulatory shock in patients with bowel gangrene, likely due to hemorrhaging into the gangrenous bowel lumen and peritoneal cavity. Similar to the latter report, our study presented a high rate of sigmoid gangrene in patients suffering from toxic and/or hypovolemic shock. However, the cause and effect relationship between bowel gangrene and shock is unclear, and sigmoid gangrene likely causes hypovolemic and/or toxic shock due to volume loss into the obstructive bowel lumen and the absorption of toxic products.3,14 Our series showed a similar correlation between sigmoid gangrene and major comorbid diseases, including pulmonary, vascular, cardiac or coronary, metabolic, renal, and neurologic diseases.
When patients with a symptom period of less than 4 days were compared with patients with a symptom period of great than 4 days, Bhatnagar et al3 found no correlation between symptom duration and sigmoid gangrene. However, according to Raveenthiran,14 patients with bowel gangrene presented much earlier than patients with viable bowels, and this inverse correlation between symptom duration and gangrene occurrence is a well-known phenomenon. In contrast, another study demonstrated that a prolonged symptom period was a predisposing factor for shock, and the development of gangrene might also be attributed to a prolonged symptom period.10 In our study, an increased rate of bowel gangrene was observed when comparing patients having a symptom period greater than 24 hours with patients having a symptom period less than 24 hours. However, in our experience, a prolonged symptom period can affect mortality by predisposing the patient to shock and occasionally, gangrene.
According to Raveenthiran et al,2 twists less than 180° are considered a normal physiological volvulus. Luminal obstruction occurs when torsion exceeds 180°, while vascular compromise ensues when torsion exceeds 360°. Our study revealed an increased rate of sigmoid gangrene in patients with overrotation (greater than 360°), which can be explained by mechanical factors. In some patients, bowel gangrene may develop at an earlier phase due to overrotation.10 In many SV patients, torsion occurs in an anticlockwise direction for unknown reasons,2 as observed in our series. Although the present study revealed no correlation between torsion direction and sigmoid gangrene, there is not enough available literature to evaluate this connection.
The relationship between bowel gangrene and the presence of ileosigmoid knotting associated with SV is a well-discussed subject in the literature, and ileosigmoid knotting has been observed to increase the rate of bowel gangrene from 6.8–15.8% to 63.6–84.4%, according to Ballantyne et al,5 Oren et al,9 Kotisso et al,23 Machado,24 and Atamanalp.25 Similar to the previous reports, in our series, SV patients with ileosigmoid knotting experienced a higher rate of bowel gangrene incidence than the other SV patients; likely due to double-loop obstruction.
In conclusion, an inverse correlation was found between pregnancy and sigmoid gangrene, while positive correlation was observed between bowel gangrene and major comorbid diseases, toxic and/or hypovolemic shock, prolonged duration of symptoms, overrotation, and associated ileosigmoid knotting.
Footnotes
Conflict of interest statement:
The authors declerate that they have no conflict of interest to the publication of this article.
REFERENCES
- 1.Atamanalp SS. Sigmoid volvulus. EAJM. 2010;42:144–9. doi: 10.5152/eajm.2010.39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Raveenthiran V, Madiba TE, Atamanalp SS, De U. Volvulus of the sigmoid colon. Colorectal Dis. 2010;12:e1–e17. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2010.02262.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bhatnagar BNS, Sharma CLN, Gautam A, Kakar A, Reddy DCS. Gangrenous sigmoid volvulus: a clinical study of 76 patients. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2004;19:134–42. doi: 10.1007/s00384-003-0534-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ballantyne GH. Review of sigmoid volvulus: history and results of treatment. Dis Colon Rectum. 1982;25:494–501. doi: 10.1007/BF02553666. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ballantyne GH, Brandner MD, Beart RW, Ilstrup DM. Volvulus of the colon. Incidence and mortality. Ann Surg. 1985;202:83–92. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198507000-00014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Pahlman L, Enblad P, Rudberg C, Krog M. Volvulus of the colon. Acta Chir Scand. 1989;155:53–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Safioleas M, Chatziconstantinou C, Felekouras E, Stamatakos A. Clinical considerations and therapeutic strategy for sigmoid volvulus in the elderly: A study of 33 cases. World J Gastroenterol. 2007;14:921–4. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i6.921. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kuzu MA, Aslar AK, Soran A, Polat A, Topcu O, Hengirmen S. Emergent resection for acute sigmoid volvulus-Results of 106 consecutive cases. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;45:1085–90. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-6364-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Oren D, Atamanalp SS, Aydinli B, Yildirgan MI, Basoglu M, Polat KY, et al. An algorithm for the management of sigmoid colon volvulus and the safety of primary resection: Experience with 827 cases. Dis Colon Rectum. 2007;50:489–97. doi: 10.1007/s10350-006-0821-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Atamanalp SS, Aydinli B, Ozturk G, Basoglu M, Yildirgan MI, Oren D, et al. Classification of sigmoid volvulus. Turk J Med Sci. 2008;38:425–9. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Khanna AK, Kumar P, Khanna R. Sigmoid volvulus: study from a north Indian hospital. Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;42:1081–4. doi: 10.1007/BF02236708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Grossmann EM, Longo WE, Stratton MD, Virgo KS, Johnson FE. Sigmoid volvulus in Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Centers. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43:414–8. doi: 10.1007/BF02258311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.De U, Ghosh S. Single stage primary anastomosis without colonic lavage for left-sided colonic obstruction due to acute sigmoid volvulus: a prospective study of one hundred and ninety-seven cases. ANZ J Surg. 2003;73:390–2. doi: 10.1046/j.1445-2197.2003.t01-2-02654.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Raveenthiran V. Restorative resection of unprepared left-colon in gangrenous vs. viable sigmoid volvulus. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2004;19:258–63. doi: 10.1007/s00384-003-0536-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Heis HA, Bani-Hani KE, Rabadi DK, Elheis MA, Bani-Hani BK, Mazahreh TS, et al. Sigmoid volvulus in the Middle East. World J Surg. 2008;32:459–64. doi: 10.1007/s00268-007-9353-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Nuhu A, Jah A. Acute sigmoid volvulus in a West African population. Ann Afr Med. 2010;29:109–12. doi: 10.4314/wajm.v29i2.68204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Mulas C, Bruna M, Garcia-Armengol J, Roig JV. Management of colonic volvulus. Experience in 75 patients. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2010;102:239–48. doi: 10.4321/s1130-01082010000400004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Atamanalp SS, Ozturk G. Sigmoid volvulus in the elderly: Outcomes of a 43-year, 453-patient experience. Surg Today. 2011;41:514–9. doi: 10.1007/s00595-010-4317-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kolusari A, Kurdoglu M, Adali E, Yildizhan R, Sahin HG, Kotan C. Sigmoid volvulus in pregnancy and puerperium: a case series. Cases J. 2009;2:9275. doi: 10.4076/1757-1626-2-9275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Atamanalp SS, Ozturk G. Sigmoid volvulus in pregnancy. Turk J Med Sci. 2012;42:9–15. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lord SA, Boswell WC, Hungerpiller JC. Sigmoid volvulus in pregnancy. Am Surg. 1996;62:380–2. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.De U, De KK. Sigmoid volvulus complicating pregnancy. Indian J Med Sci. 2005;59:317–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kotisso B, Bekele A. Ileosigmoid knotting in Addis Ababa: a three-year comprehensive retrospective analysis. Ethiop Med. 2006;44:377–83. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Machado NO. Ileosigmoid knot: a case report and literature review of 288 cases. Ann Saudi Med. 2009;29:402–6. doi: 10.4103/0256-4947.55173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Atamanalp SS. Ileosigmoid knotting in the elderly: outcomes of 32 cases over 44.5 years. Pak J Med Sci. 2011;27:812–5. [Google Scholar]