Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 6;8:11737. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-30179-1

Table 1.

Summary of statistical tests comparing the different treatments with the treatment comprising 100% of the sampled area (96% OTUs).

Community ANOVA F statistics ANOVA p value ANOVA Lowest % of core sampled significantly different from the 100% treatment
Percentage of metazoan taxa NA 4.1 <0.001 1% (0.2 g)
Number of unique OTUs Non-Metazoan Eukaryotes 67 <0.001 85% (24 g)
Metazoans 23 <0.001 78% (22 g)
Margalef index Non-Metazoan Eukaryotes 57 <0.001 71% (20 g)
Metazoans 17 <0.001 57% (16 g)
ACE richness Non-Metazoan Eukaryotes 51 <0.001 78% (22 g)
Metazoans 19 <0.001 63% (18 g)
PERMANOVA F Statistics PERMANOVA p value Lowest % of core sampled significantly different from the 100% treatment
Beta-Diversity Non-Metazoan Eukaryotes 2.5 <0.001 43% (12 g)
Metazoans 1.9 <0.001 71% (20 g)

One-way parametric analysis of variance ANOVA was used to test for the effect of sample volume. P values smaller than 0.01 indicate a significant effect of sample volume. Pairwise comparisons between the 100% treatment and the other 13 treatments were performed with the Tukey HSD test. Effects of sample volumes on beta-diversity differences among treatments were tested with PERMANOVA. Differences between the 100% treatment and the other 13 treatments for beta-diversity was tested with PERMDISP. The treatment with the highest sample volume still different from the treatment comprising 100% of the sampled area in each of the variable is presented in the last column of the table.