Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 6;8:11773. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-30273-4

Figure 4.

Figure 4

IDH mutation predictive modeling with and without lesion location information radiomics. (A) Overall diagnostic accuracy for the training set and the validation set is shown. Diagnostic accuracy without lesion location information was as high as 0.82 for the training set and 0.83 for the validation set. This accuracy further improved to 0.85 (p = 0.01) and 0.87 (p = 0.04) respectively by including lesion location info. Sensitivity and negative predictive value also improved significantly by implementing lesion location information in predictive modeling (*p < 0.05). (B) Radiomic components significant for predictive modeling is shown. Frontal lobe tumor involvement (MNI_str_loc.04) was one of the most significant features for being the tumor to be IDH mutated, while the magnitude of contrast enhancement (Gdzscore_ara.of.Gd.) was for IDH-wt. Averages and standard deviations of 5 repetitive analyses are shown for both (A) and (B). PPV stands for “positive predictive value” and NPP for “negative predictive value”.