Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 6;8:11739. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-30168-4

Table 4.

Univariate and multivariable analysis of disease free survival (DSS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

Feature DSS PFS
Univariate Multiivariable Univariate Multiivariable
HR (95% CI) P value HR (95% CI) P value HR (95% CI) P
value
HR (95% CI) P
value
Age
(>55.2 vs. ≤55.2) 1.15 (0.46–2.87) 0.759 — — 1.68 (1.00–2.79) 0.046 — —
Sex
(male vs. female) 0.91 (0.33–2.55) 0.872 — — 0.93 (0.53–1.63) 0.804 — —
Clinical stage
(III/IV vs. I/II) 2.25 (0.85–5.97) 0.103 — — 2.40 (1.34–4.30) 0.003 2.41 (1.48–3.91) <0.001
Fuhrman grade
(III/IV vs. I/II) 3.70 (1.47–9.30) 0.005 2.83 (1.17–6.81) 0.020 1.73 (0.97–3.08) 0.063 — —
Tumor size 1.22 (1.08–1.38) 0.001 1.68 (1.07–2.66) 0.024 1.04 (0.96–1.12) 0.354 — —
MVI
(Present vs. Absent) 0.39 (0.14–1.04) 0.062 — — 1.05 (0.94–1.16) 0.354 — —
Nuclear OCT4 Expression
High vs. low 0.62 (0.20–1.88) 0.399 — — 1.60 (0.94–2.72) 0.079 —
Nuclear NANOG Expression
High vs. low 1.00 (0.37–2.68) 0.986 — — 1.38 (0.89–2.12) 0.141 — —
Cytoplasmic NANOG Expression
High vs. low 1.00 (0.39–2.54) 0.996 — — 1.86 (1.22–2.83) 0.004 1.58 (1.02–2.45) 0.041
OCT4 nuclear/NANOG nuclear
High vs. Other phenotypes 0.84 (0.30–2.35) 0.752 — — 0.51 (0.32–0.82) 0.005 0.55 (0.34–0.90) 0.018
OCT4 nuclear/NANOG cytoplasmic
High vs. Other phenotypes 0.83 (0.33–2.08) 0.706 — — 0.70 (0.46–1.64) 0.096 — —

Abbreviations: HR hazard ratio; CI confidence interval MVI; Microvascular invasion.

Values in bold are statistically significant.

The variables with P value less than 0.2 were included in multivariable analyses.