Table 4.
Sex | AP threshold (mV) |
AP amplitude (mV) |
AP half-width (ms) |
Spike latency (ms) |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EtOH | Male | Female | Male | Female | Male | Female | Male | Female |
Control | 35 ± 1 | 27 ± 5 | 84 ± 6 | 73 ± 6 | 1.32 ± 0 | 1.68 ± 0.20 | 50 ± 15 | 98 ± 65 |
EtOH | 29 ± 3 | 27 ± 4 | 67 ± 9 | 65 ± 4 | 1.48 ± 0.18 | 2.11 ± 0.26 | 40 ± 21 | 72 ± 28 |
Data shown are action potential (AP) threshold, action potential amplitude, action potential half-width and spike latency for male and female rats in both the Control and SPS conditions. ANOVA revealed one main effect of sex on action potential half-width, in which females have longer action potential half-widths compared to males (p < 0.05; see text for details). Data are shown as mean ± SEM.