Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 31;9:345. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00345

Table 1.

Descriptive Characteristics* of the Sample.

Variable type Variables Overall
Sociodemographic Age (Years)
< 25
26–40
>40

119 (24.6%)
189 (39.0%)
176 (36.4%)
Gender
Male
Female

162 (33.4%)
322 (66.5%)
Employment status
Employed
Unemployed
Student

313 (64.7%)
66 (13.6%)
105 (21.7%)
Relationship status
Married/cohabiting/partnered
Single/separated/divorced/widowed

302 (63.7%)
172 (36.3%)
Living situation Where respondents live after the fire
Own home
Renting or other accommodation

282 (58.4%)
201 (41.6%)
Where respondents lived after the wildfire relative to where they lived before the wildfire
Same home they lived in before the fire
Different home although previous home was not destroyed by the fire
Different home because previous home was destroyed by the fire

383 (79.3%)
51 (10.6%)
49 (10.1%)
Exposure to disaster Where respondent was on the day of the evacuation
At home
At work/school/shops or running errands in town
Out of town

222 (45.9%)
224 (46.3%)
38 (7.9%)
Area of residence relative to destroyed properties
0–1.0 properties destroyed per kilometer square
1.1–50.0 properties destroyed per kilometer square
50.1–300.0 properties destroyed per kilometer square

107 (22.2%)
336 (69.6%)
40 (8.3%)
Respondents witnessed burning of homes by the wildfires 331 (68.8%)
Respondents were fearful for their lives or the lives of friends/family 388 (81.2%)
How frequently did respondents watch television images about the devastation caused by the wildfires during the period of the evacuation
Daily
Less frequently than daily

424 (87.8%)
59 (12.2%)
How frequently did respondents read newspaper and internet articles related to the devastation caused by the wildfires
Daily
Less frequently than daily

390 (80.4%)
95 (19.6%)
Home was completely destroyed by the wildfire 53 (11%)
Home suffered substantial smoke damage 51 (10.6%)
Suffered no loss of property or business from the wildfire 234 (48.4%)
Clinical history Respondent had a history of depressive disorder before the wildfire 52 (10.8%)
Respondent had a history of anxiety disorder before the wildfire 69 (14.4%)
Respondent had no history of mental health diagnosis before the wildfire 383 (79.8%)
Respondents were on antidepressants before the wildfire 46 (9.6%)
Respondents were on sleeping medication before the wildfire 19 (4.0%)
Respondents were on mood stabilizers before the wildfire 14 (2.9%)
Respondents were on no psychotropic medication before the wildfire 412 (85.8%)
Support Received sufficient support from family and friends
Yes, absolute support
Yes, some support
Yes, but only limited support
Not at all

318 (65.8%)
112 (23.2%)
38 (7.9%)
15 (3.1%)
Received sufficient support from the Red Cross
Yes, absolute support
Yes, some support
Yes, but only limited support
Not at all

219 (45.5%)
183 (38%)
68 (14.1%)
11 (2.3%)
Received sufficient support from the government
Yes, absolute support
Yes, some support
Yes, but only limited support
Not at all

163 (34.2%)
170 (35.7%)
88 (18.5%)
55 (11.6%)
Received sufficient support from insurers
Yes, absolute support
Yes, some support
Yes, but only limited support
Not at all
Not Applicable as respondent did not have insurance

191 (40.7%)
123 (26.2%)
50 (10.7%)
34 (7.2%)
71 (15.1%)
Post-crisis counseling Sought counseling after the wildfire 64 (13.3%)
Received counseling after the wildfire 67 (13.9%)
Objective measures Respondents had elevated symptoms consistent with GAD
(based on GAD-7 scale)

96 (19.8%)
Alcohol Use Identification Test (AUDIT)
≤ 7 (low risk drinking or abstinence)
≥8 (High risk, harmful or hazardous drinking or alcohol dependence)

416 (86%)
68 (14%)
Drug Use Identification Test (DUDIT)
≤ 5 for men and ≤ 1 for women(No drug related problems)
≥6 for men and ≥2 for women (Drug related problems)

435 (89.7%)
50 (10.3%)
Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence
≤ 4 (low to moderate dependence)
≥5 (moderate to high dependence)

453 (93.4%)
32 (6.6%)
*

Demographic and clinical characteristic were all self-reported.