Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 31;9:1710. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01710

Table 2.

Relative abundances (%) of major known bacterial taxa* in the FLP and the CAP of the monocultures of Ent. caudatum and Epi. caudatum.

Relative abundance (%)* P-value
Phylum
 Lowest taxa assigned** Ent. caudatum Epi. caudatum Ent. vs. Epi. CAP vs. FLP Species × fraction Detection in CAP#
FLP CAP FLP CAP
Acidobacteria 0 2.43 0 1.79 0.251 <0.001 0.251 Only
     o_Ellin6513 0 1.40 0 0.71 0.058 <0.001 0.058 Only
Actinobacteria 0.02 6.89 0 4.38 0.051 <0.001 0.054 Enriched
     c_Actinobacteria 0 1.75 0 0.42 0.101 0.009 0.101 Only
     o_Acidimicrobiales 0 5.10 0 3.96 0.260 <0.001 0.260 Only
Bacteroidetes 38.6 21.0 44.0 18.8 0.312 <0.001 0.020
     o_Bacteroidales 38.6 10.2 44.0 12.1 0.021 <0.001 0.241
     f_BS11 5.71 0.42 2.35 0.03 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
     f_Paraprevotellaceae 2.01 1.03 0.31 0.34 <0.001 0.057 0.042
     g_Prevotella 23.5 4.78 29.8 8.54 0.015 <0.001 0.529
     g_Sediminibacterium 0 9.99 0 6.47 0.028 <0.001 0.028 Only
Cyanobacteria 0 0.80 0.02 1.82 0.118 <0.001 0.130 Enriched
Fibrobacteres 1.64 0.43 0.31 0.37 0.003 0.014 0.007
Firmicutes 12.1 15.5 12.7 15.4 0.901 0.130 0.876
     c_Bacilli 0.15 6.93 0.13 0.31 0.020 0.015 0.020 Enriched
     o_Bacillales 0.15 5.49 0 0.21 0.045 0.041 0.058 Enriched
     o_Clostridiales 11.7 8.38 11.7 14.8 0.024 0.930 0.024
     f_Planococcaceae 0.15 3.68 0 0.03 0.143 0.168 0.175
     f_Lachnospiraceae 6.18 4.05 3.54 8.61 0.366 0.167 0.001
     g_Butyrivibrio 0.48 1.91 0.82 7.24 0.004 <0.001 0.009 Enriched
     g_Coprococcus 0 0.52 2.16 0.35 <0.001 0.021 <0.001
     f_Ruminococcaceae 1.88 1.61 3.62 2.59 0.005 0.168 0.420
     g_Ruminococcus 0.29 0.93 2.46 1.79 <0.001 0.964 0.070
Planctomycetes 0.06 1.77 0.10 1.54 0.622 <0.001 0.511 Enriched
     c_Planctomycetia 0.06 1.08 0.10 1.16 0.799 <0.001 0.913 Enriched
     f_Isosphaeraceae 0 1.03 0 1.08 0.911 <0.001 0.911 Only
Proteobacteria 40.1 48.7 38.4 53.0 0.561 <0.001 0.193 Enriched
     c_α-Proteobacteria 0 16.3 0 9.23 0.020 <0.001 0.020 Only
     o_Ellin329 0 5.66 0 3.51 0.124 <0.001 0.124 Only
     o_Rhizobiales 0 6.03 0 3.36 0.058 <0.001 0.058 Only
     f_Bradyrhizobiaceae 0 4.60 0 2.37 0.026 <0.001 0.026 Only
     f_Rhodospirillaceae 0 3.17 0 1.66 0.012 <0.001 0.012 Only
     c_β-Proteobacteria 0.15 9.57 0.06 7.90 0.372 <0.001 0.417 Enriched
     o_Burkholderiales 0.15 6.15 0.06 5.34 0.507 <0.001 0.587 Enriched
     f_Comamonadaceae 0.05 5.94 0 5.04 0.479 <0.001 0.525 Enriched
     g_Limnobacter 0 3.94 0 3.68 0.857 <0.001 0.857 Only
     c_δ-Proteobacteria 0.06 4.20 0.24 3.60 0.659 <0.001 0.417 Enriched
     o_Myxococcales 0 4.07 0 3.04 0.234 <0.001 0.234 Only
     f_0319-6G20 0 2.57 0 1.63 0.112 <0.001 0.112 Only
     c_γ-Proteobacteria 39.7 18.6 36.6 32.0 0.035 <0.001 0.001
     f_Succinivibrionaceae 39.6 7.35 36.4 24.6 0.013 <0.001 <0.001
     g_Ruminobacter 20.7 3.96 0 0.10 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
     g_Succinivibrio 0.27 0.35 36.3 24.4 <0.001 0.020 0.019
     f_Moraxellaceae 0.02 1.71 0 1.08 0.129 <0.001 0.148 Enriched
     g_Perlucidibaca 0 1.30 0 0.74 0.191 <0.001 0.191 Only
     o_Xanthomonadales 0 9.22 0 6.08 0.072 <0.001 0.072 Only
     f_Sinobacteraceae 0 7.88 0 5.66 0.101 <0.001 0.101 Only
     g_Nevskia 0 4.04 0 3.76 0.789 <0.001 0.789 Only
Spirochaetes 1.69 0.66 2.04 1.14 0.316 0.024 0.877
     g_Sphaerochaeta 1.29 0.08 1.51 0.21 0.595 <0.001 0.885
*

Only the taxa with a relative abundance greater than 1% at the lowest taxonomic rank were shown.

**

c, Class; o, Order; f, Family; g, Genus.

#

Found only or significantly enriched in the CAP in both monocultures.

For those taxa, only the lowest classifiable taxa were shown because their higher taxa had similar relative abundance as the taxa shown.