Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 4;10(8):e8613. doi: 10.15252/emmm.201708613

Figure 3. Cited4‐ and Rosi/PPARg‐dependent transcriptional programs overlap in differentiating adipocyte progenitors.

Figure 3

  • A
    MA‐plot of RNA expression profiles from female LinSca1+ progenitors 2 days after induction of differentiation with 100 nM Rosi, displaying the log2‐ratio of Cited4 −/− to Cited4 +/+ intensities against the average log2‐intensities for all microarray probe sets (n = 3). t‐test with Welch's correction on Cited4 −/− vs. Cited4 +/+ (Rosi).
  • B
    Comparison of the lists of genes significantly changed by Rosi in wild‐type cells (Cited4 +/+: Rosi vs. Ctrl, P < 0.01) or by Cited4‐knockout under Rosi treatment (Rosi: Cited4 −/− vs. Cited4 +/+, P < 0.01) in expression profiles from female LinSca1+ progenitors 2 days after induction of differentiation with 100 nM Rosi or vehicle (n = 3, t‐test with Welch's correction).
  • C
    Comparison of the lists of gene sets significantly enriched by Rosi in wild‐type cells (Cited4 +/+: Rosi vs. Ctrl, false discovery rate (FDR) <0.1) or by Cited4‐knockout under Rosi treatment (Rosi: Cited4 −/− vs. Cited4 +/+, FDR < 0.1) in GSEA (KEGG) (n = 3).
  • D–G
    Enrichment plots from GSEA with the KEGG (D–F) or TFT (G) gene set collection (Cited4 −/− vs. Cited4 +/+), performed on RNA expression profiles 2 days after induction of differentiation with 100 nM Rosi (n = 3). Vertical bars represent the individual genes of the gene set.
  • H
    Comparison of the lists of gene sets affected by Cited4‐knockout under Rosi or under vehicle treatment (Cited4 −/− vs. Cited4 +/+, FDR < 0.1) in GSEA as in (C).
Data information: Data points in (A) and vertical bars (D–G) represent means for individual genes.