Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 6;18:125. doi: 10.1186/s12876-018-0855-2

Table 4.

Tumor factors involving long procedure times for ESD-P

Long procedure time Shorter procedure time P
n = 30 n = 11
Previous surgery type, (%) 0.412
 Distal gastrectomy 20 (66.7%) 7 (63.6%)
 Proximal gastrectomy 3 (10.0%) 2 (18.2%)
 Pylorus preserving gastrectomy 0 (0%) 1 (9.1%)
 Esophagectomy 7 (23.3%) 1 (9.1%)
Tumor size, n (%) 0.651
  < 21 24 (80%) 10 (90.9%)
  ≥ 21 6 (20%) 1 (9.1%)
Tumor depth, n (%) 0.559
 T1a 26 (86.7%) 11 (100%)
 T1b 4 (13.3%) 0 (0%)
Lesion location, n (%) 0.719
 Upper 9 (30.0%) 4 (36.4%)
 Middle or lower 21 (70.0%) 7 (63.6%)
Suture line or anastomotic site, n (%) 0.038*
 Involved 17 (56.7%) 2 (18.2%)
 Not involved 13 (43.4%) 9 (81.8%)
Morphology, n (%) 0.287
 Flat or depressed 20 (66.7%) 5 (45.5%)
 Protruding 10 (33.3%) 6 (54.5%)
Histology, n (%) 1
 Differentiated 28 (93.3%) 11 (100%)
 Undifferentiated 2 (6.7%) 0 (0%)
Ulceration (scar) 1
 Presence 2 (6.7%) 0 (0%)
 Absence 28 (93.3%) 11 (100%)

ESD-P endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer in the postoperative stomach

The p value was calculated using the χ2 test or the Fisher exact test for categorical data

*Significant