Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 6;150(8):1107–1124. doi: 10.1085/jgp.201812072

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Presynaptic holding potential changes alter the pattern of PSC amplitudes at MLI–MLI synapses during train stimulation. (A) Scheme describing the experimental procedure. Synaptically connected MLIs were recorded under whole-cell configuration. The presynaptic cell was cyclically stimulated with a pattern given at −60 (black), −50 (red), or −80 mV (blue), consisting of a 9-s prepulse followed by a train of APs at 25 or 50 Hz, whereas the postsynaptic cell was kept at −60 mV. (B and C) Representative experiment from a presumed six–docking sites synapse. (B) Top: Consecutive postsynaptic responses to trains of presynaptic APs (25 Hz; timing indicated by vertical dotted gray lines) grouped according to the presynaptic holding potential. Bottom: Mean PSCs showing increased synaptic depression with depolarizing prepulse and decreased synaptic depression with hyperpolarizing prepulse. (C) Postsynaptic mean amplitudes as a function of stimulus time from the experiment shown in B. (D) Summary results from 12 synapses stimulated at 25 Hz (left) and 8 synapses stimulated at 50 Hz (right). Peak responses for different holding potentials are similar for i = 1 (first AP) and at the end of the train but differ for the second and third APs. (insets) Expanded view of PSC amplitudes starting from the second AP in the −50- (red) and −80-mV (blue) protocols. ±SEM intervals are indicated by shaded colored areas in C and D, main panels, and by error bars in D, insets. Note that individual entries represent trials from one experiment in C and means from various experiments in D. In C and D, statistically significant differences from the results at a holding potential of −60 mV are indicated as follows: *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01.