. 2018 Jul 24;2018:1294761. doi: 10.1155/2018/1294761

Table 4.

Conventional bimedial recession: development of horizontal squint angles.

Patient			2B^a	6	7	8
Duration of follow-up (months)			7.5	47	81	87

Total recession ∑ OD^b + OS^c (mm)			10.5	7.5	7	7

Angle @ distance	Baseline		35^e	30^e	18^e	25^e
	FU^d	1 week	18^e	4^f	7^e	5^e
		3 months	17^e	0	14^f	3^e
		Last visit	14^e	2^f	^2e,h	0.5^e,h
	DE^g (PD/mm)		2	4	2.29	3.5

Angle @ near	Baseline		33^e	23^e	12^e	16^e
	FU^d	1 week	12	0	—	0
		3 months	14^e	-2^f	6^f	3^f
		Last visit	12^e	2^f	2^e,h	0.5^e,h
	DE^g (PD/mm)		2	3.06	1.43	2.21

^aPatient 2B is the same patient as 2A who had subsequent bimedial recession with Tutopatch due to a residual angle of 14 PD; ^bOD = right eye; ^cOS = left eye; ^dFU = follow-up; ^emanifest angle; ^flatent angle; ^gDE = dose effect; ^hunderlying microesotropia with latent esophoria.