Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 22;2018:2140420. doi: 10.1155/2018/2140420

Table 1.

ROC analyses: model statistics at a tangent for the change in the m-BPI-WPS score.

Pain score change (type) PGIC AUC Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) Value (change in the pain score) Total accuracy (%)
Raw change Very much improved 0.801 73.7 77.7 −4 77.1
Raw change Much or very much improved 0.814 70.3 77.8 −3 74.5
Raw change Minimally, much, or very much improved 0.784 69.2 74.1 −2 70.5
Percentage change Very much improved 0.820 75.4 74.9 −50.0 75.0
Percentage change Much or very much improved 0.823 76.2 72.8 −33.3 74.3
Percentage change Minimally, much, or very much improved 0.790 72.7 73.3 −20.0 72.9

Percentage change = raw change in the BPI worst pain score/baseline pain score. The value of change in the pain score is defined by the intersection of a 45° tangent line with each ROC curve, which is mathematically equivalent to choosing the point at which sensitivity and specificity are the closest to being equal. AUC, area under the curve; m-BPI-WPS, modified Brief Pain Inventory-worst pain severity; PGIC, patient global impression of change; ROC, receiver operating characteristic.