. 2018 Jul 24;20(7):e11143. doi: 10.2196/11143

Table 2.

Correlations between visual paired comparison task performance by camera type and cognitive assessments.

Cognitive assessment	Tobii X2-60	P value^a	Laptop-embedded Camera	P value^a	Fisher r to z transformation (P value)
PACC^d Composite	.43	.005^b	.39	.007^b	.42
MMSE^e	.20	.21	.13	.40	.37
LM-DR^f	.30	.06	.25	.09	.16
FCSRT^g	–.05	.75	.22	.15	.11
Digit Symbol Coding	.48	.001^b	.32	.03^c	.18
Letter Fluency	.44	.004^b	.33	.02^c	.28
Category Fluency	.43	.005^b	.36	.01^c	.36
Trails A	–.45	.003^b	–.40	.006^b	.39
NIHTB-CB^h Composite	.32	.049^c	.35	.03^c	.40
PVTⁱ	.28	.09	.28	.07	.50
PSMT^j	.39	.01^c	.33	.03^c	.38
Flanker	–.006	.97	.22	.16	.16
DCCS^k	.29	.07	.37	.02^c	.35

^aDetermined by Spearman correlations and two-tailed Fisher r to z correlation comparisons.

^bP<.01.

^cP<.05.

^dPACC: : Preclinical Alzheimer’s Cognitive Composite.

^eMMSE: Mini-Mental State Exam.

^fLM-DR: Logical Memory-delayed recall.

^gFCSRT: Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test.

^hNIHTB-CB: National Institute of Health Toolbox Cognitive Battery.

ⁱPVT: Picture Vocabulary Test.

^jPSMT: Picture Sequence Memory Test.

^kDCCS: Dimensional Change Card Sort.