Table 1.
Phenotypic variation of MH and PH population in four environments
| Trait | environments | Female (cm) | Male (cm) | Mina (cm) | Max b (cm) | Meanc (cm) | SDd | CV (%)e | Kurto sisf | Skewnessg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PH population | ||||||||||
| PH | LZ | 38.20 | 81.80 | 48.90 | 75.40 | 62.15 | 5.76 | 9.27 | 0.13 | −0.14 |
| JT | 29.65 | 63.68 | 35.50 | 62.65 | 49.98 | 5.46 | 10.92 | 0.03 | −0.52 | |
| YM | 65.50 | 110.60 | 55.70 | 105.80 | 78.97 | 9.77 | 12.37 | 0.06 | −0.06 | |
| LF | 47.67 | 103.56 | 50.78 | 85.00 | 69.87 | 6.51 | 9.32 | −0.24 | −0.16 | |
| TL | LZ | 27.50 | 70.30 | 31.70 | 81.20 | 56.45 | 5.99 | 10.62 | 1.64 | 0.40 |
| JT | 20.86 | 48.38 | 16.50 | 41.40 | 28.95 | 4.52 | 15.63 | 0.90 | 1.31 | |
| YM | 51.32 | 88.30 | 38.60 | 128.00 | 83.30 | 10.39 | 12.47 | 1.63 | 0.30 | |
| MH population | ||||||||||
| PH | LZ | 51.00 | 80.50 | 51.90 | 84.70 | 68.75 | 6.73 | 9.78 | 0.07 | −0.44 |
| JT | 49.40 | 70.75 | 43.30 | 82.00 | 58.53 | 5.99 | 10.23 | 0.57 | 0.89 | |
| YM | 74.10 | 110.60 | 59.40 | 94.70 | 75.19 | 7.35 | 9.77 | 0.27 | −0.33 | |
| LF | 50.90 | 93.50 | 50.78 | 94.78 | 70.01 | 7.89 | 11.26 | −0.11 | 0.02 | |
| TL | LZ | 41.87 | 68.90 | 35.40 | 67.00 | 51.09 | 5.82 | 11.39 | 0.05 | −0.36 |
| JT | 26.30 | 53.50 | 23.15 | 50.75 | 30.65 | 4.43 | 14.45 | 0.84 | 1.98 | |
| YM | 55.10 | 80.00 | 46.40 | 75.90 | 60.04 | 6.70 | 11.16 | 0.07 | −0.58 | |
aMax(cm): The maximum value of phenotypic data in the two RIL populations
bMin(cm): The Minimum value of phenotypic data in the two RIL populations
cMean(cm): The average value of phenotypic data in the two RIL populations
dSD: Standard deviation of the phenotypic trait
eCV (%): Coefficient of variation of the phenotypic trait
fSkewness: Skewness of the phenotypic trait
gKurtosis: Kurtosis of the phenotypic trait