Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Environ Pollut. 2018 May 12;240:599–606. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.05.019

Table 4.

Urinary tin concentration (unadjusted and creatinine adjusted) in U.S. children in NHANES 2011–2014.

Variable Number Detection
rate, %
Urinary tin concentration, µg/L
Urinary tin concentration, µg/g creatinine
Median
(P25-P75)
Geometric
means (SE)
p Median
(P25-P75)
Geometric
means (SE)
P
Total 1641 91.29 0.60 (0.27–1.58) 0.66 (0.04) 0.72 (0.32–1.63) 0.74 (0.04)
Age
  6–11 800 95.25 0.94 (0.43–2.48) 1.01 (0.07) <0.0001 1.49 (0.76–2.82) 1.47 (0.08) <0.0001
  12–19 841 87.51 0.43 (0.22–1.01) 0.49 (0.03) 0.41 (0.22–0.85) 0.45 (0.03)
Gender
  Male 835 91.26 0.59 (0.26–1.45) 0.64 (0.05) 0.60 0.66 (0.30–1.49) 0.70 (0.05) 0.26
  Female 806 91.32 0.63 (0.28–1.62) 0.68 (0.05) 0.78 (0.34–1.72) 0.78 (0.06)
Race/ethnicitya
  Non-Hispanic white 398 86.93 0.48 (0.24–1.24) 0.55 (0.05) 0.67 (0.30–1.41) 0.67 (0.07)
  Hispanic 525 92.95 0.65 (0.32–1.63) 0.72 (0.05) 0.001 0.73 (0.32–1.80) 0.81 (0.05) 0.08
  Non-Hispanic black 445 95.73 1.16 (0.46–2.68) V1.13 (0.11) 0.94 (0.35–2.16) 0.90 (0.08)
  Other 273 87.18 0.55 (0.23–0.33) 0.61 (0.10) 0.68 (0.33–1.82) 0.76 (0.10)
Family income to poverty ratiob
  ≤1.30 723 93.78 0.85 (0.34–1.99) 0.88 (0.07) 0.83 (0.38–2.06) 0.92 (0.06)
  1.30–3.50 505 89.70 0.56 (0.25–1.61) 0.65 (0.05) 0.02 0.73 (0.28–1.52) 0.71 (0.05) 0.03
  >3.50 291 86.94 0.47 (0.22–0.94) 0.50 (0.05) 0.51 (0.31–1.32) 0.60 (0.08)
  Missing 122 93.44 0.48 (0.27–1.05) 0.51 (0.08) 0.60 (0.35–1.45) 0.70 (0.09)
BMI categoryc
  Normal weight 1023 91.01 0.57 (0.27–1.60) 0.65 (0.04) 0.72 (0.32–1.73) 0.76 (0.05)
  Overweight 259 89.58 0.63 (0.30–1.40) 0.66 (0.06) 0.67 0. 0.33–1.43) 0.73 (0.06) 0.27
  Obese 340 93.24 0.63 (0.25–1.84) 0.69 (0.07) 0.60 (0.30–1.58) 0.68 (0.07)
  Missing 19 94.74 0.80 (0.35–1.28) 0.89 (0.26) 0.87 (0.57–1.35) 0.97 (0.26)

All the variables were adjusted using population weights for the sample in which tin concentration was measured except N (unweighted sample size). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare differences of urinary concentrations of tin among various categorical variables. The lower limit of detection of the urinary tin analysis was 0.090 µg/L.

a

Race/ethnicity was categorized based on self-reported data into Hispanic (including Mexican and non-Mexican Hispanic), non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black and other race/ethnicity (Liu et al., 2017).

b

Family income to poverty ratios were categorized as ≤ 1.30, 1.30–3.50, and > 3.50 (Johnson et al., 2013; Liu et al., 2017).

c

BMI was calculated as weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters and classified as normal weight, overweight, and obese based on the CDC’s sex-specific 2000 BMI-for-age growth charts for the U.S. Weight and height were determined by trained health technicians according to the NHANES Anthropometry Procedures Manual (WHO, n.d.-b).

CDC, Center for Disease Control and Prevention; BMI, body mass index; SE, standard error.