Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 16;33(8):1260–1267. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4425-7

Table 2.

Cohen’s κ Coefficients for the Agreement Among Seven Publication Bias Tests. Within Each Sub-Table, the Results in the Upper and Lower Triangular Are Based on the Cochrane Meta-Analyses with Non-Binary and Binary Outcomes, Respectively

Based on all Cochrane meta-analyses with at least five studies:
Begg 0.22 0.45 0.30 N/A N/A N/A
0.26 T & F 0.35 0.21 N/A N/A N/A
0.45 0.42 Egger 0.48 N/A N/A N/A
0.25 0.27 0.41 Tang N/A N/A N/A
0.13 0.21 0.34 0.54 Macaskill N/A N/A
0.25 0.28 0.42 0.93 0.52 Deeks N/A
0.24 0.24 0.38 0.65 0.45 0.64 Peters
Based on the meta-analyses that are the largest in their corresponding Cochrane systematic reviews:
Begg 0.40 0.50 0.35 N/A N/A N/A
0.29 T & F 0.46 0.27 N/A N/A N/A
0.46 0.43 Egger 0.47 N/A N/A N/A
0.25 0.27 0.43 Tang N/A N/A N/A
0.14 0.21 0.38 0.56 Macaskill N/A N/A
0.25 0.27 0.44 0.94 0.54 Deeks N/A
0.23 0.25 0.43 0.68 0.50 0.67 Peters

Cohen’s κ coefficients ≥ 0.60 are in italics

Begg, the rank test; Egger, Tang, Macaskill, Deeks, and Peters, the regression tests; T & F, the trim-and-fill method; N/A, not applicable