Table 2.
Cohen’s κ Coefficients for the Agreement Among Seven Publication Bias Tests. Within Each Sub-Table, the Results in the Upper and Lower Triangular Are Based on the Cochrane Meta-Analyses with Non-Binary and Binary Outcomes, Respectively
| Based on all Cochrane meta-analyses with at least five studies: | ||||||
| Begg | 0.22 | 0.45 | 0.30 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 0.26 | T & F | 0.35 | 0.21 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 0.45 | 0.42 | Egger | 0.48 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 0.25 | 0.27 | 0.41 | Tang | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 0.13 | 0.21 | 0.34 | 0.54 | Macaskill | N/A | N/A |
| 0.25 | 0.28 | 0.42 | 0.93 | 0.52 | Deeks | N/A |
| 0.24 | 0.24 | 0.38 | 0.65 | 0.45 | 0.64 | Peters |
| Based on the meta-analyses that are the largest in their corresponding Cochrane systematic reviews: | ||||||
| Begg | 0.40 | 0.50 | 0.35 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 0.29 | T & F | 0.46 | 0.27 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 0.46 | 0.43 | Egger | 0.47 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 0.25 | 0.27 | 0.43 | Tang | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 0.14 | 0.21 | 0.38 | 0.56 | Macaskill | N/A | N/A |
| 0.25 | 0.27 | 0.44 | 0.94 | 0.54 | Deeks | N/A |
| 0.23 | 0.25 | 0.43 | 0.68 | 0.50 | 0.67 | Peters |
Cohen’s κ coefficients ≥ 0.60 are in italics
Begg, the rank test; Egger, Tang, Macaskill, Deeks, and Peters, the regression tests; T & F, the trim-and-fill method; N/A, not applicable