Skip to main content
. 2018 May 21;41(2):371–378. doi: 10.1590/1678-4685-GMB-2017-0008

Table 3. Association of UCP polymorphisms with pCAD.

N (%) MAF Model OR (95% CI) Pc
UCP2 A55V C/C C/T T/T
Control 191 (25.0) 394 (51.7) 178 (23.3) 0.491 Dominant 0.095 (0.76-1.19) 0.682
(N= 763)
pCAD 256 (27.1) 459 (48.7) 228 (24.2) 0.485 Recessive 1.15 (0.92-1.43) 0.193
(N= 943) Additive 1.09 (0.88-1.35) 0.114
UCP2 -866 G/G G/A A/A
Control 222 (29.1) 377 (49.4) 164 (21.5) 0.461 Dominant 0.82 (0.65-1.03) 0.098
(N= 763)
pCAD 211 (22.2) 501 (52.8) 236 (24.9) 0.513 Recessive 1.43 (1.15-1.78) 0.003
(N= 943) Additive 0.68 (0.53-0.85) < 0.001
UCP3 -55 C/C C/T T/T
Control 552 (72.3) 192 (25.2) 19 (2.5) 0.150 Dominant 1.29 (0.67-2.49) 0.432
(N= 763)
pCAD 708 (74.7) 219 (23.3) 18 (1.9) 0.134 Recessive 1.14 (0.91-1.41) 0.229
(N= 943) Additive 1.15 (0.93-1.42) 0.362

pCAD: premature coronary artery disease. MAF: Minor Allele Frequency. The models were adjusted by age, gender, BMI, and HDL-C.

Bonferroni correction was made multiplying by 3 comparisons (Pc). Significant p values are in bold.