Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Affect Disord. 2018 Mar 29;235:7–14. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.03.013

Table 2.

Diagnostic Comparisons of Cognitive and Functioning Data

Statistics
BD (n = 200) HC (n = 49) t or χ² p Ф or η2p
Cognitive Domains (Z score)
  Processing Speed −0.3003 (0.54) −0.0002 (0.51)a −3.52 0.001 0.05
  Attention/Vigilance −0.5642 (1.05) 0.0000 (1.00)b −3.35 0.001 0.04
  Working Memory −0.2693 (0.88) 0.0006 (0.82)a −1.93 0.06 0.02
  Verbal Learning −0.3280 (0.97) −0.0007 (0.94)a −2.12 0.04 0.02
  Visual Learning −0.2904 (0.94) −0.0005 (1.00)a −1.89 0.06 0.01
  Reasoning/Problem-Solving −0.0999 (1.06) −0.0002 (1.00)a −0.59 0.56 0.00
  Cognitive Composite Score −0.3111 (0.61) 0.0059 (0.64)b −3.17 0.002 0.04

Social Cognitive Domains (Z-Score)
  MSCEIT −0.2070 (1.07) 0.0000 (1.00)a −1.22 0.22 0.01
  RMET −0.3192 (0.87) −0.0008 (1.00) −2.24 0.03 0.02
  Social Cognitive Composite Score −0.2630 (0.80) −0.0085 (0.83)a −1.97 0.05 0.02

WHODAS Overall without work 21.39 (14.09) 4.88 (6.62)b 11.90 <0.001 0.20

Note: Data are given as mean (standard deviation).

a

n = 48;

b

n = 47.

BD, Bipolar Disorder; HC, Healthy Control; MSCEIT, Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test; RMET, Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test; WHODAS, World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule, η2p, partial eta-squared.