Table 2.
Mean | SD | |
Respondents in each component, % | ||
Large connected group | 54.6 | |
Smaller groups | 12.7 | |
Isolated with no referrals in any direction | 32.4 | |
No of friends, % | ||
0 | 32.4 | |
1 | 26.3 | |
2 | 17.1 | |
3 | 11.0 | |
4 | 6.4 | |
5 | 3.9 | |
6 or more | 2.8 | |
Average no of friendship ties | 1.6 | 1.6 |
Average Centrality Scores | ||
Closeness centrality | 0.034 | 0.031 |
Betweenness centrality | 0.00000662 | 0.000024 |
Eigenvector centrality | 0.004 | 0.034 |
Based on 824 respondents. Each respondent reports the friendship ties within the community. The large connected group includes the biggest component where all subjects are connected with intermediate ties. Centrality measures are estimated using Pajek.