Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 2;9:576. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00576

Table 1.

Pain threshold findings from experimental studies during noxious stimulation in migraine patients.

References Subjects Migraine phase Stimulus Area of stimulation Main findings in migraine
Sand et al. (10) Episodic migraine patients (N = 41) and HCs (N = 28) Preictal Heat and cold Trigeminal and extratrigeminal Subclinical reduced PT compared to baseline
Burstein et al. (2) Episodic migraine patients with (N = 33) and without (N = 9) CA Ictal and interictal Heat, cold and pressure Trigeminal and extratrigeminal Reduced PT in facial skin (79%) and forearm (67%). The authors found a positive correlation between frequency of headache and extension of low PT area
Burstein et al. (11) One episodic migraine patient with CA Ictal and interictal Heat, cold, mechanical and pressure Trigeminal and extratrigeminal Progressive lowering of PT in the facial skin and of ipsilateral forearm skin during the pain acme
Uglem et al. (12) Episodic migraine patients (N = 49) and HCs (N = 31) Ictal and interictal Heat and cold Trigeminal and extratrigeminal Reduced cold PT in the ictal phase compared to the interictal, preictal and postictal phases. No differences in heat PT
De Tommaso et al. (1316) Episodic migraine patients (N = 10, N = 18, N = 9, N = 18) Interictal and ictal CO2-laser Trigeminal and extratrigeminal Reduced PT during the migraine attack compared with baseline and related with duration of illness
Engstrøm et al. (17) Episodic migraine patients with and without aura (N = 50), and HCs (N = 34) Interictal phase Heat, cold and pressure Trigeminal and extratrigeminal Lower thermal PT in migraine patients compared to HC. Lower PT seems related to increased sleep pressure
Schwedt et al. (18) Chronic and episodic migraine patients (N = 112) and HCs (N = 75) Interictal phase Heat Trigeminal and extratrigeminal Lower heat PT in migraine patients compared to HC
Schoenen et al. (19) Episodic female migraine patients without aura (N = 10) and HCs (N = 20) Interictal phase Pressure Trigeminal Lower forehead PT in migraine patients compared to HC
Sandrini et al. (20) Episodic migraine patients without aura (N = 48) and HCs (N = 24) Interictal phase Electrical Trigeminal (cornea) Lower corneal pain thresholds in migraine patients compared to HC; the lowest values were observed on the symptomatic side of unilateral migraine patients
Fernández-de-Las-Peñas et al. (21) Episodic migraine patients with unilateral pain (N = 25) and HCs (N = 25) Interictal phase Pressure Trigeminal (temporalis and trapezius muscles) Lower pressure PT on the symptomatic side as compared with the non-symptomatic side and to either side in controls; no significant differences between the non-symptomatic side and HC
Fernández-de-las-Peñas et al. (22) Episodic migraine patients (N = 15) and HCs (N = 15) Interictal phase Pressure Trigeminal (nine points of the temporalis muscle) Lower pressure PT than HC. Lower PPT in the center compared with the posterior part of the muscle
Fernández-de-las-Peñas et al. (23) Episodic migraine patients (N = 20) and HCs (N = 20) Interictal phase Pressure Trapezius muscle (eleven points of the trapezius muscle) Lower pressure PT levels in the trapezius muscle region compared with HC
Zappaterra et al. (24) Chronic (N = 44) and episodic (N = 21) migraine patients and HCs (N = 26) Interictal phase Pressure Trigeminal (temple, cheekbone, and cervical areas) Lower pressure PT in chronic migraine patients and medications overuse; no difference of mechanical PT in episodic migraine patients
Grossi et al. (25) Chronic (N = 14) and episodic (N = 15) migraine patients and HCs (N = 15) Interictal phase Pressure Trigeminal (frontalis, temporalis, masseter) and extratrigeminal (trapezius and sternocleidomastoid) Decreased PPT in women with migraine relative to HC; no significant PPT values differences between episodic migraine patients and chronic migraine patients
Schwedt et al. (26) Chronic (N = 20) and episodic (N = 20) migraine patients and HCs (N = 20) Interictal phase Heat, cold and pressure Trigeminal (forehead) and extratrigeminal (ventral forearms) Lower thermal PT in both chronic and episodic migraine patients compared to HC; no difference in the mechanical PT
Florencio et al. (27) Episodic migraine patients (N = 30) and HCs (N = 30) Interictal phase Pressure Trigeminal (sternocleidomastoid, suboccipital, trapezius, scalene) Lower pressure PT in all muscles compared with controls
Palacios-Ceña et al. (28) Chronic (N = 52) and episodic (N = 51) female migraine patients and HCs (N = 52) Interictal phase Pressure Trigeminal (temporalis muscle), extratrigeminal (second metacarpal, tibialis anterior muscle) Lower pressure PT over trigeminal and extra-trigeminal points
Bovim (29) Episodic migraine patients with and without aura (N = 26) and HCs (N = 20) Interictal phase Pressure Trigeminal twenty-two specified points (11 on each side of the head) No significant side-to-side differences in the pressure PT in patients with strict unilateral migraine, between migraine patients and HC
Göbel et al. (30) Episodic migraine patients with migraine without aura (N = 23) and HCs (N = 29) Interictal phase Pressure Trigeminal No significant differences in pain sensitivity of pericranial musculature
Bishop et al. (31) Episodic migraine patients with migraine without aura (N = 27) and HCs (N = 27) Interictal phase Cold Extratrigeminal (non-dominant hand) No significant difference in the cold pressor test
Weissman-Fogel et al. (32) Episodic migraine patients with and without aura (N = 34) and HCs (N = 28) Interictal phase Heat and electric Trigeminal (periorbital area) and extratrigeminal (forearm) No significant differences in mean heat, mechanical, and electrical PT between migraineurs and controls
Katsarava et al. (33) Episodic migraine patients (N = 17) and HCs (N = 15) Ictal and interictal phase Electric (nociceptive blink reflex) Trigeminal
Ayzenberg et al. (34) Chronic (N = 29) and episodic (N = 16) migraine patients and HCs (N = 15) Electric (nociceptive blink reflex) Trigeminal (periorbital area) and extratrigeminal (hand) No significant differences between HC and patients with episodic migraine and depression without headache
Buchgreitz et al. (35) Episodic migraine patients (N = 60) and HCs (N = 294) Interictal phase Pressure Trigeminal (dorsum of the second finger) and extratrigeminal (anterior part of the temporal muscle) No significance differences in pressure PT
Coppola et al. (36) Episodic migraine patients without aura (N = 14) and HCs (N = 15) Interictal phase Electric (nociceptive blink reflex) Trigeminal (supraorbital area) and extratrigeminal (index finger) No significant differences between migraine patients and HC for pain threshold
Gierse-Plogmeier et al. (37) Episodic female migraine patients with (N = 10) and without (N = 10) aura and HCs (N = 20) Interictal phase Electrical Trigeminal (masseter region) and extratrigeminal (tibial region) No differences respect to pure sensory and pain electric thresholds neither for the peripheral nor for the trigeminal stimulation
Perrotta et al. (38) Patients with MOH (N = 31), episodic (N = 28) migraine patients and HCs (N = 23) Interictal phase Cold Extratrigeminal Significantly reduced mean electric PT in the MOH patients (both bWT and aWT) compared with HC; and in the MOH patients bWT compared with both the MOH patients aWT and the EM patients.
Teepker et al. (39) Episodic female migraine patients with and without aura (N = 26), HCs (N = 13) Interictal phase Heat, cold, pressure and electrical Extratrigeminal No significant differences in PT; no relationship between PT and oral contraceptives assumption
Zohsel et al. (40) Children affected by migraine with and without aura (N = 25), HCs (N = 28) Interictal phase Heat, pressure Trigeminal (upper cheek) and extratrigeminal (thenar eminence) Heat PT was not significantly different between the two groups. However, the child migraineurs showed significantly lower mechanical PT
De Tommaso et al. (41) Children affected by migraine without aura (N = 34) and HCs (N = 17) Interictal phase Laser Trigeminal (supraorbital area) and extratrigeminal (hand) Laser PT was significantly reduced in child migraineurs compared to HC at the hand level, but this difference was not significant at the trigeminal site
Ferracini et al. (42) Children affected by migraine without aura (N = 50) and HCs (N = 50) Interictal phase Pressure Trigeminal and extratrigeminal The pressure PT did not differ between children with migraine and children without headache;
Anttila et al. (43) Children affected by migraine without aura (N = 59) and HCs (N = 59) Interictal phase Pressure Trigeminal and extratrigeminal (seven pericranial and neck-shoulder tender points) The mean pressure PT did not differ among the groups
Metsahonkala et al. (44) Children affected by migraine without aura (N = 48) and HCs (N = 59) Interictal phase Pressure Trigeminal and extratrigeminal (seven cephalic and three extracephalic points) The mean pressure PT did not differ among the groups of the study
Uthaikhup et al. (45) Elders affected by migraine without aura (N = 26) and HCs (N = 44) Interictal phase Heat, cold, and pressure Trigeminal (forehead and upper neck) and extratrigeminal (tibialis anterior) No significant differences between the headache groups and HC in pressure and cold PT
Cooke et al. (46) Chronic migraine female patients (N = 15) and HCs (N = 15) Interictal phase Pressure Trigeminal and extratrigeminal The pressure PT was significantly lower in migraine patients than in HC subjects for the 1st and 2nd division of the trigeminal nerve
Kitaj and Klink (47) Episodic migraine patients (N = 40) and patients with transformed migraine (N = 41) Interictal phase Heat, cold, mechanical, and pressure Trigeminal (forehead, maxillae) and extratrigeminal (C4 dermatome, and forearms) Significantly lower pain thresholds in patients with transformed migraine compared to episodic migraine patients
De Tommaso et al. (48) Chronic migraine patients (N = 25), migraine patients without aura (N = 15) and HCs (N = 15) Interictal phase CO2-laser thermalstimulation Trigeminal (face) and extratrigeminal (hand) No significant differences in PT at both the hand and the face between the three groups
De Tommaso et al. (49) Chronic migraine patients (N = 16), migraine patients with aura (N = 10) and HCs (N = 15) Interictal phase CO2-laser pulses Trigeminal No significant differences in the PT; prevalent activation of the rostral portion of the ACC in patients with chronic migraine
De Tommaso et al. (50) Chronic migraine patients (N = 16) and HCs (N = 16) Interictal phase CO2-laser Extratrigeminal No significant differences in the PT; different modulation of bilateral parietal cortical areas and superior frontal and cingulate girus induced by different virtual reality in patients with CM compared to HC
Ferraro et al. (51) Patients with MOH (N = 14) and HC (N = 14) Interictal phase Laser Trigeminal and extratrigeminal No significant differences in the PT; deficient habituation of the vertex N2/P2 complex partly restored after successful treatment of MOH

CA, cutaneous allodynia; HCs, healthy controls; MOH, medication overuse headache; PT, pain threshold.