Table 2. Energy, Macronutrient, and Fatty Acid Intake according to Dietary Carbohydrate Intake by Sex.
Dietary carbohydrate intake (% of energy) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
<55% | 55–60% | 60–65% | 65–70% | 70–75% | 75–80% | >80% | |
Men (n=5966) | n=961 | n=671 | n=879 | n=991 | n=1038 | n=773 | n=653 |
Age (yr) | 38.2 (0.5) | 40.5 (0.6) | 44.2 (0.5) | 46.9 (0.5) | 49.1 (0.6) | 54.5 (0.7) | 59.5 (0.8) |
Energy (kcal) | 2851.0 (36.3) | 2565.3 (37.7) | 2416.8 (30.7) | 2312.8 (31.7) | 2167.5 (28.2) | 2041.5 (33.1) | 1789.3 (34.9) |
Energy (% of EER)* | 118.5 (1.5) | 107.9 (1.6) | 103.5 (1.3) | 100.2 (1.3) | 95.0 (1.2) | 91.8 (1.4) | 82.7 (1.6) |
% Energy from carbohydrate | 47.7 (0.2) | 57.7 (0.1) | 62.5 (0.1) | 67.4 (0.1) | 72.4 (0.1) | 77.3 (0.1) | 83.5 (0.1) |
% Energy from protein | 19.0 (0.2) | 16.5 (0.2) | 15.3 (0.1) | 14.3 (0.1) | 13.3 (0.1) | 12.1 (0.1) | 10.1 (0.1) |
% Energy from fat | 33.2 (0.3) | 25.8 (0.2) | 22.1 (0.1) | 18.3 (0.1) | 14.3 (0.1) | 10.6 (0.1) | 6.4 (0.1) |
% Energy from SFA | 9.7 (0.1) | 7.5 (0.1) | 6.3 (0.1) | 5.4 (0.1) | 4.1 (0.1) | 3.0 (0.0) | 1.8 (0.1) |
Women (n=7140) | n=1057 | n=748 | n=1048 | n=1158 | n=1173 | n=933 | n=1023 |
Age (yr) | 38.5 (0.5) | 40.0 (0.6) | 41.6 (0.5) | 44.6 (0.5) | 48.8 (0.5) | 53.0 (0.7) | 60.5 (0.7) |
Energy (kcal) | 2072.4 (26.5) | 1868.9 (28.3) | 1793.8 (22.9) | 1756.6 (22.7) | 1649.3 (19.7) | 1537.4 (22.5) | 1551.8 (26.4) |
Energy (% of EER)* | 107.4 (1.4) | 97.8 (1.5) | 94.5 (1.2) | 93.9 (1.2) | 89.9 (1.1) | 85.6 (1.3) | 89.4 (1.5) |
% Energy from carbohydrate | 47.9 (0.2) | 57.7 (0.1) | 62.6 (0.0) | 67.6 (0.0) | 72.5 (0.0) | 77.4 (0.1) | 84.0 (0.1) |
% Energy from protein | 18.1 (0.2) | 15.9 (0.2) | 14.7 (0.1) | 13.7 (0.1) | 12.8 (0.1) | 11.8 (0.1) | 9.9 (0.1) |
% Energy from fat | 34.0 (0.2) | 26.4 (0.2) | 22.7 (0.1) | 18.8 (0.1) | 14.7 (0.1) | 10.8 (0.1) | 6.1 (0.1) |
% Energy from SFA | 9.8 (0.1) | 7.7 (0.1) | 6.6 (0.1) | 5.4 (0.1) | 4.2 (0.1) | 3.1 (0.1) | 1.6 (0.0) |
SFA, saturated fatty acid; EER, estimated energy requirement.
All analyses accounted for the complex sampling design effect and appropriate sampling weights of the national survey using PROC SURVEY in SAS. Values are means (standard errors).
*Energy intake was evaluated as the percentage of age, sex-specific EER.